Problems With VLAN on Cisco 3800 Series Router....

We tried to split up our network so that each subnet got 60 usable IP's when they hook up.  I noticed that every VLAN we assigned .191 to, the router said it was a bad mask for it.  Example of the config:

interface GigabitEthernet0/0.5
 encapsulation dot1Q 5
 ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.6
 encapsulation dot1Q 6
 ip address 10.0.1.65 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.7
 encapsulation dot1Q 7
 ip address 10.0.1.129 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.8
 encapsulation dot1Q 8
 ip address 10.0.1.191 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.9
 encapsulation dot1Q 9
 ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
 encapsulation dot1Q 10
 ip address 10.0.2.65 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.11
 encapsulation dot1Q 11
 ip address 10.0.2.129 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.12
 encapsulation dot1Q 12
 ip address 10.0.2.191 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.13
 encapsulation dot1Q 13
 ip address 10.0.3.1 255.255.255.192
 ip nat inside
 no snmp trap link-status
 no cdp enable

People with the gateway of .1 would use .2-.62 and the people with .65 as a gateway will get .66-.126 and the people with .129 as a gateway will get .130-.190 and the people with .191 should get .192-.252  

Unfortunately the router won't allow that....When I input:
 ip address 10.0.1.191 255.255.255.192
I get a problem telling me bad mask.

Any ideas how to easily cure this?  
lttechAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
The first IP address for the 10.1.1.192 network should be 10.1.1.193

With a .192 mask, a .191 address is for broadcast.

So the IP address of your default-gateway should be 10.1.1.193

-Don
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
lttechAuthor Commented:
Don,

Would that work for .193 - .253 without a problem?
0
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Not sure I understand the question, but...

The IP address ranges would be:

Network      First Address        Last Address
.0                  .1                         .62
.64                .65                       .126
.128              .129                      .190
.192              .193                      .254

-Don
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Routers

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.