Trigonometry, Rotation

Hi experts,

I'm looking for some help with trigonometry, more specifically rotating 4 points around a centre point.

I have a rectangle,  with centre point 0,0 and want to rotate this counter-clockwise a variable number of degrees.  Say 45 degrees for example.  The 4 points on the rectangle are 6,3 : -6,3 : -6,-3 : 6,3.

I know this involves sin and cos but I cannot figure out how to use these functions.

So, simply put - how do i work out the new coordinates for a rotation of 45 degrees for the above coordinates.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
Eoin.
LVL 1
inemaAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

InteractiveMindCommented:
New_Y = Old_Y * Sin ( angle )
New_X = Old_X * Cos ( angle )
InteractiveMindCommented:
So, rotating the point (6,3) CCW by 45°, would be result in the point:

  ( 6*Cos(45), 3*Sin(45) )  =~  ( 4.2, 2.12 )
NovaDenizenCommented:
Close but not quite, InteractiveMind.

New_Y = Old_Y * cos( angle ) + old_x * sin(angle)
New_X = Old_X * Cos ( angle ) - old_y*sin(angle)

Notice that when angle=0, the cos is 1 and the sin is 0, so new_x = old_x and new_y = old_y
CompTIA Cloud+

The CompTIA Cloud+ Basic training course will teach you about cloud concepts and models, data storage, networking, and network infrastructure.

inemaAuthor Commented:
I have read up a bit more about this:

Radius, from 0,0 to 6,3, using pythagoras' = 6.7
sqrt(6^2 + 3^2)
sqrt(45) = ~6.7

new_X = radius * cos (angle)
new_X = 6.7 * cos(45)
new_X = 2.1

new_Y = radius * sin (angle)
new_Y = 6.7 * sin(45)
new_Y = 6.4

so 6, 3 rotates to 2.1, 6.4 ?
Is this correct?

The other numbers are confusing me because of all this quadrant and negative number stuff, anyone have any ideas?

Thanks again,
Eoin
inemaAuthor Commented:
Forgot to add...

First i got the previous angle using Tan (angle) = Opposite / Adjacent

Tan (angle) = 3/6
Tan (angle) = 0.5
Angle = ~27 degrees

So new angle to work with is 27+45 = 72 degrees

I then used
radius * cos (new angle)
radius * sin (new angle)

Does this make sense? It looks correct on a poorly drawn excel spreadsheet i made :)
NovaDenizenCommented:
inema, my expressions work.

New_Y = Old_Y * cos + old_x * sin
New_X = Old_X * Cos - old_y*sin

new_x^2 + new_y^2 = (old_y*cos + old_x*sin)^2 + (old_x*cos - old_y*sin)^2
 = old_y^2 * cos^2 + 2*old_x*old_y*cos*sin + old_x^2*sin^2 + old_x^2*cos^2 - 2*old_x*old_y*cos*sin + old_y^2*sin^2
= old_y^2*(cos^2 + sin^2) + (2 - 2)*(old_x*old_y*cos_sin) + old_x*(cos^2 + sin^2)
new_x^2 + new_y^2 = old_y^2 + old_x^2
AndyAinscowFreelance programmer / ConsultantCommented:
You ought to have a look at polar and cartesian co-ordinates.  At present you are in cartesian co-ordinates (point specified by distance on x and y axes).  Polar co-ordinates are the distance and angle from a defined point/axis.  To rotate in polar co-ordinates about the center point all you do is add the angles together.

eg.
if the point is 2.5, 30 degrees after rotating by 45 degrees the point is now 2.5, 75 degrees.
inemaAuthor Commented:
NovaDenizen,
I used your expression for the top right point (6,3) and it worked.  However when I try the same expression for negative numbers the results are off.

I read a bit about quadrants and that they change positives and negatives depending on which one you are working in.  Can anyone elaborate?

AndyAinscow,
Thanks for your input, however I don't think polar co-ordinates will be beneficial as I have a cartesian map to work with - it might be one unneccessary complication too many ;)
AndyAinscowFreelance programmer / ConsultantCommented:
Two functions - one converts cartesian to polar and one converts polar to cartesian

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
inemaAuthor Commented:
okay, after doing some research on the polar/cartesian conversions i've found that this is what i was doing with my original calculations.

Thanks for the help guys.  Points go to Andy.
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Math / Science

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.