• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 308
  • Last Modified:

Constant Pointers and Constant Data

Hi, I have this useless program.

main() {
 int a=2, *pa=&a, *const kpa=&a;
 const int b=5, *pkb=&b, *const kpkb=&b;

 pkb=pa;              // 1.) OK
 *pkb=4;              // 2.) ERROR, because value that is pointed by pkb is constant.
 kpa=pa;              // 3.) ERROR, because kpa is a constant pointer.
 pa=kpkb;            // 4.) ERROR, because with pa we could change constant value that is pointed by kpkb.

 pa = (int*)kpkb;   // 5.) Correct! <---------- Why?

 *pa=4;               // 6.) OK.

And I understand why statemants 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 are correct (incorrect), but I don't understand why statemant No. 5. is correct. What makes it different from statemant No 4? Can someone help me?
1 Solution
Statement No. 5 performs an explicit cast (int *) that overrides the defined type of kpkb.
The difference is an explicit type cast:
in 5) you cast from (int * const) to (int *), it's correct. Then you assigns (int *) to (int *), thats also correct.
in 4) you dont cast and tries to assign (int * const) to (int *) it's an error (you have different types on the left and on the right) and no implicit cast possible.

Read here: http://www.possibility.com/Cpp/const.html

'C++ does not supply a standard conversion from a const type to a type that is not const.'

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now