rotoman
asked on
Unable to store document in <SERVER> names.nsf (NoteID = 0) from names.nsf (NoteID = 59714): No such entry on remote server
After an domino upgrade 5.011 to 6.5.4FP2 we received many messages in the log
Error message:
Unable to store document in <SERVER> names.nsf (NoteID = 0) from names.nsf (NoteID = 59714): No such entry on remote server
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=463&context=SSKTMJ&q1=Unable+to+store+document+in+names.nsf&uid=swg21113536&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
The cause of the problem is the profile document $Topology, after we deleted the $Topology document we did not recieved new errors.
$Topology is been made by the MAPS task on the administration server
$Topology
TopologyData1 => "DOM;NAM=XYZXYZ;"
TopologyData2 => "NWK;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
TopologyData3 => "CLS;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
replicatie server
$Topology
TopologyData1 => "DOM;NAM=XYZXYZ;"
$RarelyUsedName => "NWK;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
$RarelyUsedName => "CLS;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
Remark:
The $Topology document on the administration server has the same values as before the upgrade.
Ofline Compact -c -i has been done.
It seems that the names.nsf is getting bigger and bigger. It looks like a replication conflict within the names.nsf , but we cannot see it because we don not have te appropriate view.
We still have some domino 5 servers in the domain and we still replicate them with the domino 6.5.4FP2 servers.
Question : Why have the field names on the replication server a different name than the one on the administration server, who is changing this and how can we solve this?
Kind regards,
Rotoman
Error message:
Unable to store document in <SERVER> names.nsf (NoteID = 0) from names.nsf (NoteID = 59714): No such entry on remote server
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=463&context=SSKTMJ&q1=Unable+to+store+document+in+names.nsf&uid=swg21113536&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&lang=en
The cause of the problem is the profile document $Topology, after we deleted the $Topology document we did not recieved new errors.
$Topology is been made by the MAPS task on the administration server
$Topology
TopologyData1 => "DOM;NAM=XYZXYZ;"
TopologyData2 => "NWK;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
TopologyData3 => "CLS;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
replicatie server
$Topology
TopologyData1 => "DOM;NAM=XYZXYZ;"
$RarelyUsedName => "NWK;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
$RarelyUsedName => "CLS;NAM=You need to upgrade your client. Topology data is in R6 format;"
Remark:
The $Topology document on the administration server has the same values as before the upgrade.
Ofline Compact -c -i has been done.
It seems that the names.nsf is getting bigger and bigger. It looks like a replication conflict within the names.nsf , but we cannot see it because we don not have te appropriate view.
We still have some domino 5 servers in the domain and we still replicate them with the domino 6.5.4FP2 servers.
Question : Why have the field names on the replication server a different name than the one on the administration server, who is changing this and how can we solve this?
Kind regards,
Rotoman
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Sjef Bosman
You upgraded all servers? Or just one? In that case, make sure that you don't replicate the design of the NAB to other servers.
Hi sjef_bosman,
The Domino 6 Directory template can be used in a mixed-release environment that contains Domino 6 and Domino 4.6 or Domino 5 servers. After upgrading your first server to Lotus Domino 6, you can replicate the new template to the other servers in your organization.
Regards!
The Domino 6 Directory template can be used in a mixed-release environment that contains Domino 6 and Domino 4.6 or Domino 5 servers. After upgrading your first server to Lotus Domino 6, you can replicate the new template to the other servers in your organization.
Regards!
ASKER
The names.nsf of the 6.5.4FP2 and 5.XX servers are of the 6.5.4 template. I cannot upgrade all the servers to 6.5.4FP2 because other departments have there own servers (and have to upgrade themselves ) in the one domain.
Indead i turned of the Maps task till this is solved.
The first ( administration) server was upgraded to 6.5.4 FP2 first, Now we are upgrading the rest .
Kind regards,
Rotoman
Indead i turned of the Maps task till this is solved.
The first ( administration) server was upgraded to 6.5.4 FP2 first, Now we are upgrading the rest .
Kind regards,
Rotoman
Yes, the R6 template CAN be used, but I myself wouldn't do that. We've had some strange issues in the past when upgrading servers, and don't like issues with NABs, whatever the reason.
Just a thought, does the replicating/updating server have access to the NAB? And to that document?