Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of visaint
visaint

asked on

WebSite QA tools

Hi,
We have been using WebQA (desktop version of link checking tool) of Watchfire to QA our Web sites. Watchfire has ended support of this tool. We are looking for some alternatives. The enterprise version of this tool WebXM is expensive and seems overkill for link and accessibility checking.

Can you suggest other cheap alternatives?

Thanks,
Vivek.
Avatar of mrichmon
mrichmon

Here is a link checking tool that is free:
http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

Can you suggest a product that comes with support? Free is not always good.

Thanks,
Vivek.
It is a good tool.

I don't pay for any tool as I find the free ones do what I need.  However, you can donate to them if you really want
See http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html#FAQ
Question 4 - Can I support the author financially?
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

The problem is that everyone in my organization who is going to use this tool is not technical enough and might need some help in setting it up. So, having support with this tool is a requirement for me.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of mrichmon
mrichmon

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

That looks good. Have you tried this tool before? Any comments on its reliability (e.g. does it catch all the broken links)? One thing that I see missing in this tool which we had available in WebQA is accessibility testing. There is no spelling checker in this tool.

Any other suggestions?

I appreciate your help.
No I haven't tried it.  I don't feel a need to pay for tools when free ones can do similar things.
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

Any other suggestions that include accessibility components e.g. spell checker?

Thanks,
Vivek.
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

Dushan911,
I meant to ask accessibility components in Website QA tools. Please refer to the discussion above.
Avatar of visaint

ASKER

I was expecting more responses to a question as generic as this one. I don't feel that I got enough response. Any suggestions on making any changes to this questions to attract more responses?

Did I put it in the right section?

Thanks,
Vivek.