Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of KingSencat
KingSencat

asked on

I need a Anonymous private network

Hello experts ..


I need a anonymous private network .. example like AOL 8.0, Findnot,Ipnot .. etc ... but without internal ip starting at 10*** , 172*** 192,,*** please help me URGENT!!
Avatar of jfrady
jfrady

Could you elaborate?  "Private" network but not 10, 192, or 172 is seemingly a contradiction unless I am missing something.  Are you looking for something to VPN to or that is not doing NAT?
Avatar of giltjr
AOL 8.0 is not a private network, it is a modified version of IE.  As jfrady asked, can you elaborate?

Do you mean you want to surf the web anonymously?  Are you looking for a anonymous proxy server?
~~confused~~

As per the previous 2 comments... what do you mean by private??

If you connect to a network - you will obtain a private IP (the one's you list).

If you connect directly to an ISP, then you will get a public IP, and if you obtain a dynamic IP (like using a pay as you go dial up), then you are pretty anonymous.
However, the number you dial in from can be traced.

Is that the sort of thing you are trying to achieve?

there is of course nothing stopping you not using a non private subnet if the network is NAT'd to the outside world, however be aware that you would lose access to websites that use the IP address of your subnet as the requests would stay local rather than being routed externally.

however what i think he is after is to be able to masqeurade his real IP address. and IMHO i believe this is a bad practice and if anyone else on these boards know how to do this i would suggest it remains unsaid.
Avatar of KingSencat

ASKER

Well guys ... i am using FindNot and i have problems using one application called " Emando Operator " .. the problem is that because the findnot internal ip is starting with 10.*** and my external with 66..** and emando application confusing and i cannot use it . i have try Emando on a dial up when the internal ip and external are the same and is work fine . but the problem i want to be anonymous when i am using this program , and the only way i think is to find a private network who use same internal and external ip address . please help me i need it urgent! any commments will be appriciate.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of giltjr
giltjr
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
I want to remote somebody else computer ... the problem is that my original internal ip address starting with 192..** and i cannot use the emando operator program ... i cannot remote my friend pc .. the problem is that my internal ip is starting with 192.** . i must to find something like FindNot.com VPN . but also to dont any of the 3 internal ips that is not work in emando.
Have you contacted eMando's support and asked them?  In this day and age I find it hard to beleive that a product that is that new does not support being behind a box that does NAT.

Especially since they say:

" eMando allows you to connect to any computer connected to the Internet or your local network; custom router/firewall configuration is not required."

Please note the part about there are no custom router/firewall configurations needed.  

From what I can tell you connect to their service and your friend connects to their service and then you can remote control your friends PC.  Is this how it is supposed to work?
I am logged in the emando operator using a modem dialup and is work ..but with my lan connections i am logged in and i cannot control the remote pc.. means my lan have some problems............................ help me.
I really can't.  I have not used the product.  I would suggest contacting eMando for support.  Their doc indicates that it should work.
Your explanations do not make sense.  You said:

>problem i want to be anonymous when i am using this program

but you also said you just wanted to connect to a friend's PC - these explanations do not correlate.

I refuse to help without more resonable explanations, and a lot more clarification about the networks in question.  I'd advise others to do likewise.

Cheers,
-Jon


KingSencat:  Could you explain to me what about my commant answered your question?

I, along with others, are getting very confused about what you are trying to do.