[Last Call] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1515
  • Last Modified:

xcopy vs copy if copy works

Is there any advantage to using xcopy if copy works OK? All of the advantages I have seen for xcopy is that it does things for you the copy doesn't, subdirectories, etc. My nighty backup routines use the copy command and I have no complaints with the copy command (and I would probably complain about winning the lotto). Is there an advantage to switching to xcopy (performance, better error checking, etc)? I am going to go back and add the /v flag to my copy commands so I need to edit the procs anyway.

Thanks in advance.
1 Solution
If copy is working for you, I would continue using the copy util.  XCOPY has more functionality...however, if you do not plan to use the extra functions, I would continue using the copy command.

Hi MikeBroderick,

Agree with NJ

if it aint broke it dont need fixing :)

Featured Post

Vote for the Most Valuable Expert

It’s time to recognize experts that go above and beyond with helpful solutions and engagement on site. Choose from the top experts in the Hall of Fame or on the right rail of your favorite topic page. Look for the blue “Nominate” button on their profile to vote.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now