Server2003 OR XPPRO

Hi All,

I am wondering if I need to get Server Or XP Pro (I guess what are the main differences).  I do not need any of the software that comes with server2003 i.e. DNS,IIS,AD etc. I will be running my own custom server software on the machine that uses TCP/UDP.  Is there any speed difference in the TCP/UDP stacks to justify spending an extra $500 for Win2003 server?  Any advice is welcome. :)
kipp8rAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Jay_Jay70Connect With a Mentor Commented:
Hi kipp8r,

if you wont be using 2003 server for its server uses then xp will be fine, remeber there is a limit of 10 conections to xp though
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Basically, the TCP/IP stack is limited to 10 connections under XP Pro - no (realistic) limit in server.  So if you want to limit yourself to 10 simultaneous connections to your software, go XP.  If you want unlimited connections (~4 billion) then go with server.
0
 
kipp8rAuthor Commented:

Wow only 10 connections (I'll be needed a lot more than 10).  I guess that's how they get you to pay the extra $500 :(
0
Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
Jay_Jay70Commented:
yup, thats why xp is a client OS and specifically designed as a client OS
0
 
kipp8rAuthor Commented:
Does the 10 limit connection apply to outgoing or just incoming?
0
 
Jay_Jay70Commented:
10 concurrent connections full stop
0
 
kipp8rAuthor Commented:
Thank Jay_Jay.  
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.