?
Solved

"Delete cached copies of roaming profiles" not working

Posted on 2006-05-20
4
Medium Priority
?
3,178 Views
Last Modified: 2010-05-18
I have been having a problem with the "delete cached copies of roaming profiles" group policy setting. I have a test setup as follow:

1) Windows 2003 Small Business Server Standard Edition with all updates

2) Windows XP SP2 with all updates workstation joined to domain through "servername\connectcomputer"

The regular group policy objects seem to work. I'm even able to enforce password policies, etc. But I can't get this object to work.

I created a new GPO, its only setting is to enable delete cached copies of roaming profiles. I linked it to SBSComputers (the default containter for the new machines and the containter for my linked up workstation), but when I logout the folders for the users that have been on the computer are still there.

Any ideas?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:ssittig
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 85

Accepted Solution

by:
oBdA earned 1000 total points
ID: 16727408
Only *roaming* profiles (not local profiles!) will be deleted on logoff, and only of the user logging off; so if you already had 10 people logging on to that machine, then enabled the policy, and logged on and off with your account, at least the 9 others will still be there when you logoff. If you're not using roaming profiles, this policy has no effect.
In addition, you should install the UPHClean service on the machines on which you plan to enable this policy. This makes sure that the user's registry can be closed; otherwise, the profile might not be deleted.
User Profile Hive Cleanup Service
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=1B286E6D-8912-4E18-B570-42470E2F3582&displaylang=en
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:ssittig
ID: 16730924
I'll give that a shot and see how it works out.

Thanks,
SS
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:ssittig
ID: 16731352
Worked like a charm. I thought this GP setting would remove all of the old cached profiles also. I didn't realize I had to manually delete them. I was also unaware that I had to use the UPHCS in conjuction with it.

Thanks
0
 
LVL 85

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 16759467
You don't *have* to use the UPHCS with it, but it makes the deletion more reliable.
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Add Premium security features to your question to ensure its privacy or anonymity. Learn more about your ability to control Question Security today.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A quick step-by-step overview of installing and configuring Carbonite Server Backup.
Learn about cloud computing and its benefits for small business owners.
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an anti-spam), the admin…
We’ve all felt that sense of false security before—locking down external access to a database or component and feeling like we’ve done all we need to do to secure company data. But that feeling is fleeting. Attacks these days can happen in many w…

864 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question