• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 269
  • Last Modified:

Routing Configuration

Hello
 
I just want to get a second oppinion on a configuration I am going to be doing soon. I am using Windows servers and WAN via external service. I believe I am doing right but I just want to make sure as it is very important. At the moment we have a main site on 10.0.1.x. There is another site we are taking over which is on 192.168.0.x locally. The server which is setup there is on 192.168.0.x but I want it to also be on 10.0.9.x when I get a WAN link up so computers on the 192.168.0.0 range can access 10.0.1.x range...is this how I would set it up:
 
First NIC on server:
============

IP: 192.168.0.100
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1 (internet router, for local internet)
DNS: 192.168.0.100

Second NIC on server:
==============

IP:10.0.9.10
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: none
DNS: none (not needed...using IP addresses directly)

Windows RRAS Static Routes
===================

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 192.168.0.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.100

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 10.0.9.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 10.0.9.10

Interface: Second NIC
Destination: 10.0.9.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 10.0.9.8 (WAN Router)

End Result
=======

I am hoping by this that all computers at the other site that are on the 192.168.0.0 will have access to devices over the one (e.g. a server in 10.0.1.x range)....Actually would the RRAS settings be this in that case?:

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 192.168.0.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.100

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 10.0.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Mask: 255.255.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Gateway: 10.0.9.10

Interface: Second NIC
Destination: 10.0.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Mask: 255.255.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Gateway: 10.0.9.8 (WAN Router)

Thanks
0
dcarrion
Asked:
dcarrion
  • 4
1 Solution
 
dcarrionAuthor Commented:
oh yes and of course this route for internet

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 0.0.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Mask: 0.0.0.0 <===== CHANGE
Gateway: 192.168.0.1 (WAN Router)
0
 
dcarrionAuthor Commented:
oops i mean

oh yes and of course this route for internet

Interface: First NIC
Destination: 0.0.0.0
Mask: 0.0.0.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1 (Internet Router)
0
 
nexissteveCommented:
Normally it isnt a good idea to use windows servers for routing over a WAN.

Are you firewalling the WAN traffic?
Are both end points trusted networks?
Do you run managed switches? Are they layer2 or layer3?
Do the people providing the WAN control the end routers? i.e. are they provding the service via ethernet?
The people providing the WAN connection will reserve a set of addresses for their own use - you must make sure your two networks do not fall into the reserved set of addresses.

Easiest way to configure the two networks -

Have the provider configure the routers.

Add a route on your internet router. (or change your gateway to a different router )

ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 "ip address of providers router" permanent ( obviously this is the local address of the providers router )

For the other end do the same.

ip route 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 "ip address o providers router" permanent

The provider will have to add a few routes in on his routers as well. Make sure he doesnt utilise RIP as you may run into problems when you add services down the track.

That should about do it. This way your not relying on the windows servers to carry out routing. You wont have to utilise a second network card. If a windows server goes down then the network will continue to function.

Good luck



0
 
dcarrionAuthor Commented:
Thanks for that

no managed switches
service controls end routers
i'm assuming the provider are firewalling WAN traffic

I forgot to add that the Windows server would only be temporary as eventually we will only be using the CISCO routers provided by the WAN provider. However I might use the sites internet router to do the same thing like you said:

on internet router
==========

add route with destination 10.10.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.9.8(wan router). And at our end destination 10.10.9.0 mask 255.255.255.0 gateway 10.0.1.8 (wan router). That sound okay?  
0
 
dcarrionAuthor Commented:
Would I need NAT on the internet router to translate 192.168.0.0 addresses to 10.0.9.0?
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

  • 4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now