?
Solved

Exchange Server 2000 Upgrade to 2003

Posted on 2006-06-01
4
Medium Priority
?
336 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-06
Hi everyone
I'm just starting to research and plan for taking a single-domain forest up to 2003 r2 servers (dc's only), and exchange 2003. Currently it looks like this:
Site 1 - Windows 2000 DC/fsmo role holder + Windows 2000 DC/Exchange 2000 SP3 (I know - not my fault but it still runs happily at the moment) + 2 x 2000 Sp4 member servers - one running TS/Office 2000 for remote users and the other a SQL-based bespoke finance app.
Sites 2 and 3 - Have 1 2003 Standard Server SP1 DC (site servers) each running Symantec Corporate/plus file server/dns/dhcp. All DC's are GC's.
We have numerous other sites connecting via adsl/vpn and authenticating to our 2000 DC fsmo. Our main 3 sites are linked via Cisco Pix/High speed DSL. There's just one exchange server and it's serving about 150 mailboxes - so pretty small. The internal Ip address of this server nats to a static public ip for this server only - if there are any connectivity problems the isp is also supplying a smtp mail-feed.

The inetorgpersonprevent.ldf was run a while ago - and the schema upgraded for Windows 2003 (obviously or I wouldn't be running the above) - at the moment all is happy. We do run into problems with the limitations of 2000 dfs replicating shared organisational folders across the three sites which is one of the reasons I want to take it up to R2. The domain is currently running in Windows 2000 Native mode.
I can plug a temp server into the main site to hold the exchange mailboxes if necessary whilst I demote the exchange server, rebuild it as 2003, install exchange 2003 on it and move the mailboxes back.

Basically I need as little downtime as possible (don't we all) and so I'll be working weekends with this once I'm happy with a tested plan - our users and more importantly Directors get very upset if any part of the system goes down (especially email). I've got a test system ready to roll with this with a replica of our AD and servers plus other apps as close to our production environment as I can get it running on a virtual network. The AD on the test network is an identical replica taken from our production environment. Apart from the member servers which will stay as 2000 members for the next couple of years or so, the other apps on the DC's are compatible with 2003 Server and all dc's are of easily sufficient specs to run 2003 server. Has anyone got any real-world, experience-based "do this" and "don't do that" tips they'd like to share? (Links are fine but I'd be happier with personal experience to accompany them as I'm pretty good at trawling for the knowledge I need on the web). Thanks for all contributions - and I may not be able to get back to people until tomorrow (UK time).
Thanks
Deb :))
0
Comment
Question by:Debsyl99
  • 2
4 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:cbgmike
ID: 16808969
out of all the migrations ive done with windows migrations/upgrades, i can only recall doing one 2000 -> 2003 upgrade, but it was part of an NT 4.0 EXCH 5.5 upgrade. the procedure i had to follow was fully service pack NT4.0, and exch 5.5, then begin the upgrade. since there is no direct 4.0/5.5 to 2003 i had to go 4.0 -> 2000, 5.5 -> exch2000, service pack the 2000 installations, then upgrade from 2000 to 2003 on both server and exchange. the process was service pack OS, service pack Exchange, upgrade the OS, upgrade Exchange, test exchange, service pack OS, Service pack Exchange, test Exchange, so on until i had 2003 tested and running. it was extremely nerve racking to say the very least. during the upgrade process, i did experience email downtime, albiet for a short while. just remember that you cannot upgrade from enterprise software to standard software (2000 enterprise -> 2003 standard) this is considered a downgrade in microsofts eyes.

for safetys sake, i would run full backups of the system state and the exchange mailbox stores at the very least. and i would suggest using the temp machine as a mailbox repository while going through the upgrade procedure. this would circumvent any email outages if you fall victim to a failed upgrade.

if i can find my notes on my upgrade procedure i will post some more experiences, and if i suddenly remember anything, ill be sure to post it up as well.
0
 
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Debsyl99
ID: 16809019
Thanks cbgmike - I always take full backups and test them (learnt that one the hard way a long time ago) . I've already made sure that I can successfully recover the entire exchange installation from backup to a completely new server if necessary as part of a disaster recovery plan. All the servers are fully patched - and the editions of 2000/2003 server and 2000/2003 exchange are both Standard.
0
 
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

by:
Sembee earned 2000 total points
ID: 16810583
That is a fairly easy migration to do.
The major bottle neck will be getting the data off Exchange 2000. You have to replicate the public folder data off and PF replication on Exchange 2000 is slow. There is nothing you can do to speed it up.

You would basically do a full swing migration, which I have outlined on my web site: http://www.amset.info/exchange/migration.asp

I would swing to a temp Exchange 2003 server so that the swing back is much quicker.

The key thing is to give yourself enough time. I will often start an Exchange 2000 to 2003 migration a week or more before the mailbox data to allow replication of public and system folders to take place naturally.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 20

Author Comment

by:Debsyl99
ID: 16810706
That's a top article Simon - thank you. I'll keep this open a bit longer just in case - but that looks like it covers it exactly.
Best wishes
Deb :))
0

Featured Post

Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

There can be many situations demanding the conversion of Outlook OST files to PST format and as such, there is no shortage of automated tools to perform this conversion. However, what makes Stellar OST to PST converter stand above the rest? Let us e…
Among the most obnoxious of Exchange errors is error 1216 – Attached Database Mismatch error of the Jet Database Engine. When faced with this error, users may have to suffer from mailbox inaccessibility and in worst situations, permanent data loss.
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…
Planning to migrate your EDB file(s) to a new or an existing Outlook PST file? This video will guide you how to convert EDB file(s) to PST. Besides this, it also describes, how one can easily search any item(s) from multiple folders or mailboxes…
Suggested Courses

621 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question