• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 255
  • Last Modified:

which one is faster?

pIII 1.2 ghz or celeron 2.13 ghz


I want to know which one is a faster CPU.
for general applications and running some not much resource comsuming games.
0
coolx
Asked:
coolx
3 Solutions
 
BertSublimeCommented:
depends what you mean by faster, the 2.13 GHz is 'faster' because it does more calculations a second, however i have a feeling thats not quite what you meant with the question.
0
 
BertSublimeCommented:
for bench marks look at this website it should have the two processors your looking at http://tomshardware.co.uk/2003/02/17/benchmark_marathon/index.html
0
 
rindiCommented:
The celeron is much faster, not only in terms of speed, but also because it uses the P-IV core and not the old P-III.
0
Improved Protection from Phishing Attacks

WatchGuard DNSWatch reduces malware infections by detecting and blocking malicious DNS requests, improving your ability to protect employees from phishing attacks. Learn more about our newest service included in Total Security Suite today!

 
callrsCommented:
>>for general applications and running some not much resource comsuming games.
--> Both will do the job just fine, though the celeron will perform better because it's almost double the speed, despite its normally lower cache. I've been useing a 1.1GHz Duron for most of my work for over a year now.
But there's more to consider than just the processor!
E.g.:
- Amount of RAM is most important:: have no less than 256Meg, preferably at least 512Meg to get the best performance. I have 768Meg.
- The disk speed & the disk cache also affect performance. 2Meg cache is minimal, 8Meg is considered great, but now disks with 16Meg cache are available.
-Type of RAM matters. I use the slower SDRAM, but my motherboard can take the faster DDRAM. So I borrowed some DDR, swapped the RAM, & did a speed test. Here are the results showing a DRAMATIC difference:

DDR:
Cache Burst 32 Report,   Creation Date: 14-Mar-2006 at 21:36:30    OS version: Windows 98™SE
Processor: AMD Duron™ 1110,93 MHz Core: [0670] Morgan 0.18 µm
Memory 32-bit Bandwidth: Read: 581,85 MB/s ( 7,28 Cycles), Write: 299,32 MB/s ( 14,15 Cycles)
Memory 64-bit Bandwidth: Read: 752,70 MB/s ( 11,26 Cycles), Write: 301,76 MB/s ( 28,08 Cycles)
Memory 128-bit Bandwidth: Read: 680,90 MB/s ( 24,89 Cycles), Write: 301,67 MB/s ( 56,19 Cycles)
Memory Peak Bandwidth: 965,20 MB/s

SDRAM
Cache Burst 32 Report,   Creation Date: 14-Mar-2006 at 21:46:32  OS version: Windows 98™SE
Processor: AMD Duron™ 1110,93 MHz Core: [0670] Morgan 0.18 µm
Memory 32-bit Bandwidth: Read: 465,74 MB/s ( 9,09 Cycles), Write: 241,34 MB/s ( 17,55 Cycles)
Memory 64-bit Bandwidth: Read: 558,18 MB/s ( 15,18 Cycles), Write: 238,77 MB/s ( 35,49 Cycles)
Memory 128-bit Bandwidth: Read: 567,61 MB/s ( 29,86 Cycles), Write: 239,00 MB/s ( 70,92 Cycles)
Memory Peak Bandwidth: 660,46 MB/s
0
 
callrsCommented:
Those memory tests were done with Cache Burst 32: http://user.rol.ru/~dxover/cburst/

Also affecting your computer performance would be the software environment & running tasks.
-Number of startup items. You can use autoruns from sysinternals.com to check your system & disable startup items.
-Any adware/spyware running? Check with adaware from lavasoftusa.com

A 1.2 GHz with greater (512kB?) cache  can run better  than a 2GHz with lesser (256kB?) cache when all the other factors are taken into consideration. But other things being equal, the 2GHz one wins. But get a 2GHz P4, not celeron, if you can LOL.
0
 
callrsCommented:
Check out these related links
http://www2.geek.com/discus/messages/27/6102.html%3F1077217867    Geek.com Message Parlor: PIII versus Celeron
www.sysopt.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-82880.html  SysOpt Forums - PIII vs Celeron
www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-1920-14Ghz-Celeron-vs-1Ghz-PIII.html     1.4Ghz Celeron -vs- 1Ghz PIII - TechSpot Troubleshooting
0
 
CallandorCommented:
It looks like it will be close - a Celeron 2.4 Northwood is a little better than a PIII 1.2 Tualatin http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/12/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_part_2/page14.html, and if this Celeron 2.13 is a Celeron D 310, it will be about 10 - 25% better than the same speed Celeron Northwood http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2093.  I would say a Celeron D 310 will outperform the PIII 1.2.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Azure 2017

Azure has a changed a lot since it was originally introduce by adding new services and features. Do you know everything you need to about Azure? This course will teach you about the Azure App Service, monitoring and application insights, DevOps, and Team Services.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now