Solved

Exchange 2003 IMF strips 2K to 4K messages a day...Is there something wrong with the configuration?

Posted on 2006-06-08
4
256 Views
Last Modified: 2010-03-06
Don't get me wrong....I love the fact that IMF is working (even though it took a little tweaking with the SCLs to get it optimal). However, I find it difficult to beleive that for an 80-user company we are getting that much junkmail. Much of the "sent to" addresses are either old accounts that were deleted some time ago, or accounts that we never had. Is there something that I am missing in the configuration? Could our server be replying to senders in some way propogating more UCE, or is it really normal to get this ammount?

Environment: Windows 2003 SP1 with Exchange 2003 SP2 over it, fully patched. No front end server configuration, single Exchange server.

In ESM: Message Delivery Options- Recipient Filtering is not selected; Sender ID Filtering Accept (default); Connection Filtering not configured (default) but some addresses have been allowed to global allowed list. Virtual SMTP server- Apply IMF, apply Sender Filter, apply Connection Filter.

Maybe I should just be happy that it's working, but I have to go through all the UCE every couple of days to make sure it's really junk.

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:jefferybush
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 104

Accepted Solution

by:
Sembee earned 50 total points
Comment Utility
The major problem is allowing email to be delivered to accounts that don't exist.
If you turn on recipient filtering and the tar pit feature you will see a massive drop in email messages being caught. My home Exchange server (which has five accounts on it) blocks between 400 and 600 messages a DAY that are sent to invalid users. Therefore you 2000 plus does not surprise me at all.

Recipient filtering filters at the handshake, so the message isn't even delivered to your server. If it is a legitimate misspelling then the sender will get an NDR immediately.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:jefferybush
Comment Utility
Thanks Simon. I have enable recipient and the tarptitting feature, we'll see how it goes. Will all messages sent to invalid addresses get an NDR and help the spammer with harvesting tho? Or will the 5 second delay in SMPT responses fix that?

Jeff
0
 
LVL 104

Expert Comment

by:Sembee
Comment Utility
Tar pit deals with the directory harvesting. It slows down the spammer so that it becomes uneconomic to attack your system.
Think how long five seconds is, and then think how many responses a spammer COULD get in that time.

Simon.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:jefferybush
Comment Utility
Thanks again!
0

Featured Post

Maximize Your Threat Intelligence Reporting

Reporting is one of the most important and least talked about aspects of a world-class threat intelligence program. Here’s how to do it right.

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

ADCs have gained traction within the last decade, largely due to increased demand for legacy load balancing appliances to handle more advanced application delivery requirements and improve application performance.
Not sure what the best email signature size is? Are you worried about email signature image size? Follow this best practice guide.
In this video we show how to create a mailbox database in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Data…
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…

744 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

16 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now