Solved

Type / Pointer Question

Posted on 2006-06-13
3
172 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
Octree      *m_children[8];

Is this:

A pointer to an array of OCTree's

0
Comment
Question by:directxBOB
3 Comments
 
LVL 39

Accepted Solution

by:
itsmeandnobodyelse earned 500 total points
ID: 16900214
It is a  pointer to an array of OCTree pointers.

You need to set or initialize each of these pointers in the constructor (I assume m_children is a class member), e. g.

class MyClass
{
    Octree* m_children;

public:
    MyClass()
    {
        for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(m_children/sizeof(Octree*); ++i)
             m_children[i] = NULL;
    }
    ~MyClass()
   {
        for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(m_children/sizeof(Octree*); ++i)
        delete m_children[i];
   }
   void addChild()
   {
       for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(m_children/sizeof(Octree*); ++i)
            if (m_children[i] == NULL)
                m_children[i] = new Octree(... );
   }
}

Regards, Alex


};
0
 

Author Comment

by:directxBOB
ID: 16900323
Any idea on how to port this to C#

Vector OcTreeNode::dirs[8] = {Vector(-1,1,1),Vector(-1,1,-1),Vector(1,1,1),Vector(1,1,-1),Vector(-1,-1,1),Vector(-1,-1,-1),Vector(1,-1,1),Vector(1,-1,-1)};

Basically its the 8 directions for an OCtree
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:jitendra_wadhwani
ID: 16900331
Very fine Alex....




sizeof(m_children/sizeof(Octree*);
 has a typo error... missing one closing bracket...

should be
sizeof(m_children)/sizeof(Octree*);

and it will be always 8 as it is hardcoded in this case
anyway

Initialization in conctructor is fine

But Before deleing in destructor there should be Check for NULL

delete m_children[i];


if(m_children[i]  !=  NULL)
    delete m_children[i];



Anyway the answer given by Alex is good.....






0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In days of old, returning something by value from a function in C++ was necessarily avoided because it would, invariably, involve one or even two copies of the object being created and potentially costly calls to a copy-constructor and destructor. A…
C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.

863 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

26 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now