Solved

raid 1 performance

Posted on 2006-06-16
4
224 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-26
Just a very general question - If I am buying a new Dell PowerEdge server with SCSI drives to be a new Windows 2003 Terminal Server, will 30 users, all using RDP, notice any difference in performance from this new server (running simple Office 2003 applcaitions) if it has RAID 1 compared to no RAID?

I'm concerned about getting good performance but also have read that having RAID 1 is a good idea in case one of the drives fails on the Terminal server. Want to try and keep it simple as well.

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:ramick
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 32

Accepted Solution

by:
jhance earned 50 total points
ID: 16919137
RAID 1 is not about performance, but about reliability and fault tolerance.  Most HARDWARE RAID controllres will have negligible performance issues and RAID 1, being a rather simple scheme is not all that intensive anyway.  Some of the other RAID options, like RAID 5 have the potential for greater performance impact.  But in most cases a quality RAID controller will perform well.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ramick
ID: 16919395
thanks, that's what I was hoping the answer was!
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:Psyco_666
ID: 16919416
ramick,

Raid 0 - Striping - Gives you no Fault tollerance as it is sipley striping the data, putting some of it on one disk and some of it on another. This gives you a performance increese.

Raid 1 - Mirroring - gives you fault tollerance as the two drives involved are simply copies oof each other, when one fails the other one kicks in. The OS wont even see it as its controlled via the raid controller.

Raid 5 - Gives you both fault tollerance and performance increeses. Striping is used but the disks also store parity information about all the other disks in the array. So should one disk fail it can be rebuilt form the information held in the parity section of the other disks. Doing this reduces the size you have available as you have to allow for the parity information.

For yourinfo we have a terminal server here and we use RAID 1 for the Operating system partition and a RAID 5 array for the data partition.

If you want to know more have a look at  . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
0
 

Author Comment

by:ramick
ID: 16919720
thanks for your info Psyco but i was more interested in the performance difference for the end user between having RAID 1 as oposed to having no RAID on a server, which jhance has already answered.
Cheers,
0

Featured Post

Comprehensive Backup Solutions for Microsoft

Acronis protects the complete Microsoft technology stack: Windows Server, Windows PC, laptop and Surface data; Microsoft business applications; Microsoft Hyper-V; Azure VMs; Microsoft Windows Server 2016; Microsoft Exchange 2016 and SQL Server 2016.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Is it worth it to buy an Echo? In a word, yes! For me it was definitely worth it. I use mine on a daily basis. Prologue & Privacy At first, I was very skeptical about the Amazon Echo. In general, I don't like voice assistants. I don't li…
In this article we have discussed the manual scenarios to recover data from Windows 10 through some backup and recovery tools which are offered by it.
Microsoft Active Directory, the widely used IT infrastructure, is known for its high risk of credential theft. The best way to test your Active Directory’s vulnerabilities to pass-the-ticket, pass-the-hash, privilege escalation, and malware attacks …
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…

809 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question