Solved

Can't Create Cisco Multilink Frame Interface (MFR0)

Posted on 2006-06-16
19
769 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-09
I'm doing some pre-setup in anticipation for a new multilink frame relay install.  Based on a sample config from my ISP and reference from other sources I was trying to create the multi link inerface by using the following command:

Router(config)# interface mfr0

Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to accept mfr. "Unrecognized command".  

I've got a Cisco 2621 running IOS 12.3(19). My WIC card is a Cisco, VWIC 2MFT-T1

Any ideas?
0
Comment
Question by:icarus004
  • 9
  • 6
  • 4
19 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16922714
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16922726
look at supported platforms and Code required

thanks
Scott
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16922795
Right, I see where it says "Multilink Frame Relay feature will be released on the Cisco 2500 series, 2600 series, 3600 series, 4000 series, and 7200 series platforms in Cisco IOS Release 12.2(3)T."

I'm running 12.3(19) on a Cisco 2600. Unless I'm missing something, I should definitely meet requirements.
0
Easy, flexible multimedia distribution & control

Coming soon!  Ideal for large-scale A/V applications, ATEN's VM3200 Modular Matrix Switch is an all-in-one solution that simplifies video wall integration. Easily customize display layouts to see what you want, how you want it in 4k.

 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16922826
what about the interface requirements?  looks like the were pretty heafty a T3 or OC3??? are you doing this accross multipule interfaces or one large interface?

Thanks
Scott

When you talk multilink are you talking physical link or just different PVC's?

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16922999
I see what you're talking about but my ISP says the card I've got is all I need.

The service will be two physical frame relay links bonded in my router to create a 3MB connection.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16923021
I have set this up with a Virtual template and PPP are you sure that is not what they are talking about? sounds like a bonded T solution not a frame.

Thanks
Scott
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16923038
No. It's definitely frame relay. Here's what a sample config should look like...

controller T1 0/0
 framing esf
 clock source line
 linecode b8zs
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 speed 64 !
controller T1 0/1
 framing esf
 clock source line
 linecode b8zs
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 speed 64 !
controller T1 0/2
 framing esf
 clock source line
 linecode b8zs
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 speed 64 !
controller T1 0/3
 framing esf
 clock source line
 linecode b8zs
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 speed 64 !
interface MFR0
 no ip address
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface MFR0.[DLCI] point-to-point
 ip address [Customer WAN IP] 255.255.255.252  frame-relay interface-dlci [DLCI] IETF !
interface Serial0/0:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay MFR0
 no arp frame-relay
!
interface Serial0/1:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay MFR0
 no arp frame-relay
!
interface Serial0/2:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay MFR0
 no arp frame-relay
!
interface Serial0/3:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay MFR0
 no arp frame-relay
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 MFR0.[DLCI] [SBCIS WAN IP]
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16923087
have you created the subinterfaces yet?  and turned both serials into encap frame-relay MFRO?  because that would be required before you could set up the interface MRF0

thanks
Scott
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16923132
Good thought. I was hoping that is what it was. Unfortunately....

ROUTER(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay MFRO
                                                                   ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

ROUTER(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay ?
  ietf  Use RFC1490/RFC2427 encapsulation
  <cr>

It only gives me the option of IETF.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16923157
did a search on cisco's website for that comand and got nothing back at all... I will keep diggin though.

Thanks
Scott
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 16924467
>ROUTER(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay MFRO <== is this MFR-Zero? or MFR- Oh?
It should be a zero
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16924557
Oops, that was a typo up there. It should have been a zero. I used zero when trying it out though.  Again, the only option I can use after "encapsulation frame-relay" is ietf.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 16926710
Can you create the interface?
Router(config)#interface MFR0.1 point-to-point

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16926737
Nope. MFR... isn't an option. The only "M" that I can choose is MultiLink.
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 16926848
What feature set do you have? IP Base, IP PLUS, ??
From "show ver" post the actual .bin filename...
i.e.  c2600-mz-is-123-19.T.bin

Something like that
0
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 500 total points
ID: 16926869
It should be available with IPPLUS
12.3(19)
c2600-is-mz.12.3-19
          ^  the "is" tells us that it is the IP PLUS feature set
But not IP BASE
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16926876
It's definitely IP Base.... c2600-i-mz.123-19.bin

I'll put an IP PLUS version on Monday and will report back.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16937336
Just a quick update. I've had to order a billger flash and some more memory to install that IP PLUS feature set. I expect to do thiis Wednesday morning and will report back shortly.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:icarus004
ID: 16949936
The IP PLUS feature set did the trick. After moving to that MFR is now available.  Thanks!
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

While it is possible to put two routes in place with the secondary having a higher metric, this may not always work. In the event of a failure that does not bring down the physical interface on the router the primary route is not removed. There is a…
New Server 172.16.200.2  was moved from behind Router R2 f0/1 to behind router R1 int f/01 and has now address 172.16.100.2. But we want users still to be able to connected to it by old IP. How to do it ? We can used destination NAT (DNAT).  In DNAT…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

792 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question