Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 384
  • Last Modified:

Routing traffic between segments

I have a Cisco 2811 router sittinng between to seperate network segments.
I put a static route on the ASA of route inside 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.5
On the 2811 router I have ip routing turned on.  I need to access the server on the seperate segment via RDP, ping, drive mappings, etc.. Why is not working or what am I missing?


Server                         FA0/1 10.10.20.3        FA0/0 10.10.0.5                         FA0/0 10.10.0.1         FA0/1 public ip to internet
10.10.20.10 -------------------------------|(2811)|---------------------[SW]------------------------|ASA 5510|----------------
                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                   |
                                                                                                 wkst 10.10.0.145
                                                                                                 GW 10.10.0.1
0
cisco_2k2
Asked:
cisco_2k2
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
 
Scotty_ciscoCommented:
The ASA is probably a lot like the pix turn your DF gw to the FA 0/0 or 10.10.0.5 many security devices can not route a packet out the same interface which they recieve the packet on they usually eat them.

Thanks
Scott
0
 
cisco_2k2Author Commented:
Even if I switch my GW to 10.10.0.5 or add a route to my workstation, I can not get past the 10.10.20.3 interface of the router to the seperate segment.  I can successfully ping the interface for the segment but any other hosts do not respond to pings or connection attempts.
0
 
Scotty_ciscoCommented:
what is the servers gateway and does it have any static routes?  Are there any ACL's in place on the router?

Thanks
Scott
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
cisco_2k2Author Commented:
The servers GW is 10.10.20.1 which goes out to a separate Internet/VPN connection.  I currently do not have any static routes set on the server.  Here is the cfg from the router:

Current configuration : 1024 bytes
!
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname 2811RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
logging buffered 4096 debugging
enable secret 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
enable password xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
!
clock timezone NewYork -5
clock summer-time NewYork date Apr 6 2003 2:00 Oct 26 2003 2:00
no network-clock-participate aim 0
no network-clock-participate aim 1
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
!
!
ip cef
!
!
ip name-server 10.10.0.201
no ftp-server write-enable
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description $ETH-LAN$
 ip address 10.10.0.5 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 no mop enabled
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 description $ETH-LAN$
 ip address 10.10.20.2 255.255.255.0
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
ip classless
ip http server
!
!
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
access-list 101 permit icmp any any
!
control-plane
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
 password xxxxxxxx
 login
!
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
!
end
0
 
Scotty_ciscoCommented:
well there is the problem if you do a route print how does it know to get to the workstation.... try putting a route add 10.10.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.3 -p in the server from the command prompt.

see if that fixes the problem the VPN could be causing issues if that does not work post a route print.

Thanks
Scott
0
 
cisco_2k2Author Commented:
Thanks scott for the help!  Considering I have some developers making changes onn the server, they removed the route statement and turned on the windows firewall after turning it over to them.   I just assumed that the server was in the same state.  It is working again.

Thanks
Cisco_2k2
0
 
Scotty_ciscoCommented:
Ah Developers..... got to love to hate them!!! I have a pretty good crew of them now but in past jobs not so lucky they always blame the network as well think it is their favorite pastime.

Thanks
scott
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now