[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

VPN and MLPPP?

Posted on 2006-06-20
3
Medium Priority
?
1,468 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
We are considering a 6MB committed T3 vs a 4 x T1 using MLPPP as our internet connection (from AT&T).  Because of our distance from a high-speed POP the T3 will cost over twice as much.

Around 2/3 of our traffic will be a VPN connection to our corporate office.    My understanding is that MLPPP (unlike load balancing) allows a single session to use the full bandwidth, but I want to make sure that there wouldn’t' be any issues with the VPN tunnel on MLPPP.

Primarily looking for someone who has done this before.
0
Comment
Question by:etude
3 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:Scotty_cisco
ID: 16947367
We currently bond 3 T1's between 2 sites and you can do MLPPP and loadbalance per packet or should be able to.  I have not seen a situation were one user has been able to saturate the entire link.

Is that what your asking

See this solution

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Hardware/Routers/Q_21886560.html

this is a current example configuration....The biggest draw back is the limited ability to add more bandwidth as needed.  I would say if your cost is that much different then go with MLPPP no brainer seen the difference between a DS3 and this and pretty similar the DS3 did have considerable burstability though which was needed at the time.

Thanks
scott
0
 

Author Comment

by:etude
ID: 16947442
Partly.  The big difference is that our MLPPP connection would be with our ISP using a public IP address.  Traffic going out to the public internet would go straight out the router, no big deal.  The issue is that about 1/2 to 2/3 of our traffic is intra-office traffic going through a VPN tunnel to our corporate WAN.  The VPN tunnel would appear to the router as a single session.

I just want to make sure that the VPN will be able to use all available bandwidth and not be limited to 1.5.
0
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
The--Captain earned 2000 total points
ID: 16955724
AFAIK, the channel-bonding and the VPN operate at completely different network layers - the bonded link should be transparent to any sort of VPN.

Cheers,
-Jon
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
In this article I will be showing you how to subnet the easiest way possible for IPv4 (Internet Protocol version 4). This article does not cover IPv6. Keep in mind that subnetting requires lots of practice and time.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

834 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question