Solved

SBS2003 DNS problems - client pc internet is intermittently slow

Posted on 2006-06-26
8
574 Views
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
I have an SBS2003 server with 10 client pcs.

Just recently I have added a 4 new forward lookup zones in the DNS configuration. This seems to have caused the client pcs internet connection to slow quite dramatically; either internet requests timeout or the pages (such as yahoo or google) take up to 30 seconds to load. However there are times when the internet is running well which I presume is due to caching either on the server or the clients.

The server has the following services running: iis, dns, exchange & sql but does not have IAS. I plugged the internet connection directly into a laptop and it works very well.

Does anybody have any suggestions for solving this problem?
I have searched the internet without much luck. Is there a way to boost the DNS priority on the server to improve it's response time?
0
Comment
Question by:andychilds
  • 4
  • 3
8 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:andychilds
ID: 16982384
I have been troubleshooting the problem this morning and on the first try to sites (such as google.com, yahoo.com) an nslookup will time out 2-3 times before finally finding the correct ip address.
0
 
LVL 82

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 16982418
Have you configured your machines to use an outside DNS server in the TCP/IP settings? If so, change that to use *only* your SBS as DNS server, and configure forwarders to point to your ISP's DNS server.

10 DNS Errors That Will Kill Your Network
http://mcpmag.com/features/article.asp?EditorialsID=413

Frequently Asked Questions About Windows 2000 DNS and Windows Server 2003 DNS
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=291382

Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server and in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=825036
0
 

Author Comment

by:andychilds
ID: 16982428
The client PCs are configured to look at the server and I have configured two dns forwarders.
0
 
LVL 70

Accepted Solution

by:
Chris Dent earned 250 total points
ID: 16982444

The first thing I would suspect is the Forwarders. Remove those and see if you still get slow resolution.

Without them your server will use the Root Hints file (the servers listed under the Root Hints tab in the Properties for your DNS server), then it works down from those servers to get to the right domain - and you really shouldn't notice a speed issue with that.

Chris
0
Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

 

Author Comment

by:andychilds
ID: 16982490
Thanks Chris-Dent, that has improved the performance.

But why has this made a difference though? I have been using dns forwarder ip addresses for over a year; why would it suddenly change?
I can only think that it is caused by the forward lookup zones I have added for the domain names that I host on the server. I have been adding them as primary zones, and then adding 'a name' records for www; is this the correct?
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 16982563

> But why has this made a difference though? I have been using dns forwarder ip addresses for over a year;
> why would it suddenly change?

I couldn't say really... you're effectively handing off all the work to an upstream DNS, in this case your ISPs DNS. You would have to ask them to try and fix the problem - if they even admit there is one or can find it.

It could be something as simple as the server they use is getting old and generally getting unresponsive. Or they've got a lot more traffic being handled by it now.

Anyway, the change you've made means that instead of relying on your ISPs DNS to do all the running around your own server will do it. I normally prefer that configuration anyway simply because you don't have to put up with whatever happens at your ISP.

> I can only think that it is caused by the forward lookup zones I have added for the domain names that I
> host on the server. I have been adding them as primary zones, and then adding 'a name' records
> for www; is this the correct?

It should have no effect on name resolution except within the domains you have explicity added - and that's entirely intentional. There's certainly no reason for it to effect it in a more general sense.

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:andychilds
ID: 16982572
Thanks very much Chris for all your help.
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 16982581

It's a pleasure.

Chris
0

Featured Post

Top 6 Sources for Identifying Threat Actor TTPs

Understanding your enemy is essential. These six sources will help you identify the most popular threat actor tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Join & Write a Comment

by Batuhan Cetin Within the dynamic life of an IT administrator, we hold many information in our minds like user names, passwords, IDs, phone numbers, incomes, service tags, bills and the order from our wives to buy milk when coming back to home.…
Setting up a Microsoft WSUS update system is free relatively speaking if you have hard disk space and processor capacity.   However, WSUS can be a blessing and a curse. For example, there is nothing worse than approving updates and they just have…
In this seventh video of the Xpdf series, we discuss and demonstrate the PDFfonts utility, which lists all the fonts used in a PDF file. It does this via a command line interface, making it suitable for use in programs, scripts, batch files — any pl…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now