Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win


SBS2003 DNS problems - client pc internet is intermittently slow

Posted on 2006-06-26
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2008-02-01
I have an SBS2003 server with 10 client pcs.

Just recently I have added a 4 new forward lookup zones in the DNS configuration. This seems to have caused the client pcs internet connection to slow quite dramatically; either internet requests timeout or the pages (such as yahoo or google) take up to 30 seconds to load. However there are times when the internet is running well which I presume is due to caching either on the server or the clients.

The server has the following services running: iis, dns, exchange & sql but does not have IAS. I plugged the internet connection directly into a laptop and it works very well.

Does anybody have any suggestions for solving this problem?
I have searched the internet without much luck. Is there a way to boost the DNS priority on the server to improve it's response time?
Question by:andychilds
  • 4
  • 3

Author Comment

ID: 16982384
I have been troubleshooting the problem this morning and on the first try to sites (such as google.com, yahoo.com) an nslookup will time out 2-3 times before finally finding the correct ip address.
LVL 85

Expert Comment

ID: 16982418
Have you configured your machines to use an outside DNS server in the TCP/IP settings? If so, change that to use *only* your SBS as DNS server, and configure forwarders to point to your ISP's DNS server.

10 DNS Errors That Will Kill Your Network

Frequently Asked Questions About Windows 2000 DNS and Windows Server 2003 DNS

Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server and in Windows Server 2003

Author Comment

ID: 16982428
The client PCs are configured to look at the server and I have configured two dns forwarders.
Veeam Task Manager for Hyper-V

Task Manager for Hyper-V provides critical information that allows you to monitor Hyper-V performance by displaying real-time views of CPU and memory at the individual VM-level, so you can quickly identify which VMs are using host resources.

LVL 71

Accepted Solution

Chris Dent earned 1000 total points
ID: 16982444

The first thing I would suspect is the Forwarders. Remove those and see if you still get slow resolution.

Without them your server will use the Root Hints file (the servers listed under the Root Hints tab in the Properties for your DNS server), then it works down from those servers to get to the right domain - and you really shouldn't notice a speed issue with that.


Author Comment

ID: 16982490
Thanks Chris-Dent, that has improved the performance.

But why has this made a difference though? I have been using dns forwarder ip addresses for over a year; why would it suddenly change?
I can only think that it is caused by the forward lookup zones I have added for the domain names that I host on the server. I have been adding them as primary zones, and then adding 'a name' records for www; is this the correct?
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 16982563

> But why has this made a difference though? I have been using dns forwarder ip addresses for over a year;
> why would it suddenly change?

I couldn't say really... you're effectively handing off all the work to an upstream DNS, in this case your ISPs DNS. You would have to ask them to try and fix the problem - if they even admit there is one or can find it.

It could be something as simple as the server they use is getting old and generally getting unresponsive. Or they've got a lot more traffic being handled by it now.

Anyway, the change you've made means that instead of relying on your ISPs DNS to do all the running around your own server will do it. I normally prefer that configuration anyway simply because you don't have to put up with whatever happens at your ISP.

> I can only think that it is caused by the forward lookup zones I have added for the domain names that I
> host on the server. I have been adding them as primary zones, and then adding 'a name' records
> for www; is this the correct?

It should have no effect on name resolution except within the domains you have explicity added - and that's entirely intentional. There's certainly no reason for it to effect it in a more general sense.


Author Comment

ID: 16982572
Thanks very much Chris for all your help.
LVL 71

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 16982581

It's a pleasure.


Featured Post

Ask an Anonymous Question!

Don't feel intimidated by what you don't know. Ask your question anonymously. It's easy! Learn more and upgrade.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I guess it is not common knowledge to most Wintel engineers/administrators: If you have an SNMP-based monitoring system in your environment (and it's common to have SNMP or Syslog) it's reasonably easy to enable monitoring of the Windows Event logs,…
Many of us need to configure DHCP server(s) in their environment. We can do that simply via DHCP console on server or using MMC snap-in on each computer with Administrative Tools installed in a network. But what if we have to configure many DHCP ser…
Please read the paragraph below before following the instructions in the video — there are important caveats in the paragraph that I did not mention in the video. If your PaperPort 12 or PaperPort 14 is failing to start, or crashing, or hanging, …
Look below the covers at a subform control , and the form that is inside it. Explore properties and see how easy it is to aggregate, get statistics, and synchronize results for your data. A Microsoft Access subform is used to show relevant calcul…

971 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question