Solved

Per server reached" increasing for unknown reason, why?

Posted on 2006-06-29
9
451 Views
Last Modified: 2008-08-06
The "per server reached" column increased by 5 for some unkown reason. I am using per server licensing. I have 37 users and only 30 clients and 40 per server licenses but per server reached is 45. I am getting "not enough licenses available" when attempting to map an application to win 2000 server. I have tried a temporary fix by increasing the licensing to 45 which allowed me to map the application. But, then the next day the "per server reached" jumped by 5 and again and I couldn't map drives again. This is a spiral I desparately want to avoid. Help please.
0
Comment
Question by:dawes4000
  • 5
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 17012560
Just disable the license logging service (start with the member servers, PDC emulator last); Microsoft acknowledges that the LLS doesn't really do what it's supposed to do, and that you can safely disable it in most cases (it's disabled by default in Server 2003; you still need enough CALs ...).
Description of the License Logging Service in Windows Server Operating Systems
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=824196
0
 

Author Comment

by:dawes4000
ID: 17044592
Thanks oBdA disabling the license logging service worked. I was able to get all of my applications mapped. It sure would be nice to know, however, which clients and applications were using up the resources. I'm not sure how to get a proper accounting of how many per server licenses really are needed.
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 17044865
If you have a domain, and you have more than one server, you're usually better off with "Per Seat" licensing. If you have 40 per server licenses and two servers, you need to assign, for example, 20 to Server A and 20 to Server B. If 21 users are now traing to access Server A at the same time, you've exceeded the limit.
With Per Seat licensing, you only need as many CALs as you have user accounts (don't forget service and test accounts).
0
Simplifying Server Workload Migrations

This use case outlines the migration challenges that organizations face and how the Acronis AnyData Engine supports physical-to-physical (P2P), physical-to-virtual (P2V), virtual to physical (V2P), and cross-virtual (V2V) migration scenarios to address these challenges.

 

Author Comment

by:dawes4000
ID: 17044995
I have 4 servers in my DMZ 1 LINUX and 3 W2K. Virtually all of my applications run on only 1 w2k server. There are only 38 users in the company. I don't see how spliting the licenses would work, I need almost all licenses on the one app server. If one user is using 3 apps on the app server do they need 3 licenses for each app? I'm suspecting this may be the case.
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 17045079
Server CALs are based on SMB sessions (basically share or print services), not on the number of applications on that server.
Per Server licensing is based on (concurrent) connection *per* *server*. That means *every* server needs the proper amount of licenses according to the number of users accessing it at the same time. With three servers and 40 users, and each user accessing each server at the same time, you'd basically need 120 licenses.
Per Seat licensing is based on the number of users in your domain (not concurrent!), independent of the number of servers you're running, so 40 licenses would be enough.
0
 

Author Comment

by:dawes4000
ID: 17045677
Lets just say I have only one server, and 40 users using that one server. Since this server grants access  based on session (per server licensing) of the client computer, it does not matter how many applications are consumed by one client that uses this said server... ccrrect? Then I add to the domain another server that will basically be a "testing server" no applications, would I then need to double my licenses to 80? That doesn't make sense.
0
 
LVL 84

Accepted Solution

by:
oBdA earned 500 total points
ID: 17045747
You'll need as much licenses as users accessing this test server at any given time.
As I said: as soon as you have a domain and more than one server, you're better off with "Per Seat" licnesing. You can do a one-time transition from Per Server top Per Client (which, since you disabled the LLS anyway, means that you just decide to use "Per Seat" from now on).
0
 

Author Comment

by:dawes4000
ID: 17045868
Ok, got it. But this puts me in a difficult situation. I don't know where all these licenses are. When I arrived here the server was already set up and configured as a per-server network. Since I have been here I have purchased only five more licenses. How do I convert to a "Per Seat" network? I don't have the all licensing information.
0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:oBdA
ID: 17048704
You'd do that with the "Licensing" in Control Panel, but as I said, since you're not using the LLS anymore, it doesn't really matter. You just need enough CALs.
0

Featured Post

Comprehensive Backup Solutions for Microsoft

Acronis protects the complete Microsoft technology stack: Windows Server, Windows PC, laptop and Surface data; Microsoft business applications; Microsoft Hyper-V; Azure VMs; Microsoft Windows Server 2016; Microsoft Exchange 2016 and SQL Server 2016.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

NTFS file system has been developed by Microsoft that is widely used by Windows NT operating system and its advanced versions. It is the mostly used over FAT file system as it provides superior features like reliability, security, storage, efficienc…
Some of the SEO trends we might expect in 2017.
A short tutorial showing how to set up an email signature in Outlook on the Web (previously known as OWA). For free email signatures designs, visit https://www.mail-signatures.com/articles/signature-templates/?sts=6651 If you want to manage em…

840 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question