SPID Locks

My application ceases to respond when an spid XX (blocked) occurs on SQL Server 2000 sp4 .(XX being the number assigned to the user/query) My dot.NET application does not require table or row locks when any "Select" statement is used. Can I resolve this in the application code.

1.  Will the use of "NO LOCK" in queries resolve the 'blocking'/"blocked" problem at SQL level.

2.  Is there a way of setting up SQL to ensure there are no table locks for all queries from the application.

I have 250 users on the systems currently, hence this is urgent and valued at 500. We have just updated to sp4. Had no problems with  previous SQL 2000 installation.

Thanks  
JenebyMAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Aneesh RetnakaranDatabase AdministratorCommented:
JenebyM,
> 1.  Will the use of "NO LOCK" in queries resolve the 'blocking'/"blocked"  problem at SQL level.

NOLOCK is same as ANSI defined isolation level 'read uncommitted', It means that a transaction running under this isolation level can read data modified by transactions that have not yet committed.  A query that runs under NOLOCK or read uncommitted isolation level, it will not get blocked by concurrent updates.

0
 
ShogunWadeCommented:
concur with above.      If when you establish your connectiions you issue SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION READ UNCOMMITTED it will avoid blocking,   but you need to be careful about dirty yreads  (See BOL for details).  Additionalliy you may want to look at what commands are issued to the instance via profiler and see it you can optimise performance,  this the faste the response, the less impact locking has.

BEWARE - If you open a ADO.NET transation and dont specify the isolation level it will set the isolation levelback to read committed.
0
 
JenebyMAuthor Commented:
The above addresses part #1 in my question to some extent. Before I attempt the resolution however can you comment on part 2 of the question.

This is because I would like to avoid changes application source code, i.e to then specify isolation level on the ado.net transaction instances on the entrie souce code.

Will the following permanently achieve the same effect of avoiding blocking if I run this script on the database.

USE KENDB
GO
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
GO
DBCC USEROPTIONS
GO

0
Cloud Class® Course: CompTIA Healthcare IT Tech

This course will help prep you to earn the CompTIA Healthcare IT Technician certification showing that you have the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in installing, managing, and troubleshooting IT systems in medical and clinical settings.

 
Aneesh RetnakaranDatabase AdministratorCommented:
0
 
ShogunWadeCommented:
No it wont.    At least Not if you have a


.BeginTransation() call in your client.      If you dont stipulate the issolatin level in such a command it is hard coded to set the isolation level back to READ COMMITTED.
0
 
JenebyMAuthor Commented:

I assume that if the isolation level of ALL .BeginTransaction() call is set to "readuncommitted" in the dot.NET apps then the SQL Server isolation level will remain readuncommitted.

Is this assumption correct.
0
 
ShogunWadeCommented:
Sorry,  Ive been away for a few days....



"I assume that if the isolation level of ALL .BeginTransaction() call is set to "readuncommitted" in the dot.NET apps then the SQL Server isolation level will remain readuncommitted."
Yes You're correct .
0
 
JenebyMAuthor Commented:
We now have a much more serious situation.i.e Speed/Performance.

The machine which had the dot.Net apps and SQL Server 2000 crashed last week. We have a new machine that is of a higher specification than the previous machine but the performance is so bad that the application is unusable.

The things I have checked on the new machine include:
updating to Win 2000 sp4
updating SQL Server to sp4
updating MDAC_TYPE to 2.8
updating to .netfx 1.1
Web.Config & machine.config files
Database table re-indexing (2gb database)
and more

Any obvious things I should look for when a dot.NET web apps cannot connect to SQL Server 2000 at a resonable speed.

 
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.