Solved

Cisco Product selection

Posted on 2006-06-30
2
217 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
Can Cisco 2950 switches be stacked to act as one switch? We will need one 2950 switch with GBIC fiber to accept the backbone feed. We will ultimately need 48 port capacity. Would I be better off getting a 48 port switch with the GBIC slots or one 24 with GBIC and one standard 24 port? Will performance suffer with two 24 port switches? 24 ports would probably get us started but we'd be at or very close to capacity. I'm trying to decide whether I should go ahead and get the 48 port or start with the 24 port first and then add another when needed and if I choose the later will there be any performance loss.
0
Comment
Question by:comtekso
2 Comments
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
Scotty_cisco earned 500 total points
ID: 17019897
You can go either route personally you can cross connect and cluster the 2950's but a 48 port 3550 is a better fit for many reasons and is easier to manage.  

If you connect the 2 24 port switches together you will not see any performace hit at all just more network equipment to manage and more power supplies to possibly fail. In turn though you have 1 48 port switch and it dies everything is down so I don't think its an either or situation but rather what are you trying to accomplish -redundancy or port density.

Thanks
scott
0
 

Author Comment

by:comtekso
ID: 17019980
Thnaks Scott, that helps with my decision. My main concern is port density because I will probably be slightly over 24 ports, but erndundancy is a good thing. So providing that there won't be any performance hit I'll probably go with two 24 so I have redundancy if needed.

Thanks.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

New Server 172.16.200.2  was moved from behind Router R2 f0/1 to behind router R1 int f/01 and has now address 172.16.100.2. But we want users still to be able to connected to it by old IP. How to do it ? We can used destination NAT (DNAT).  In DNAT…
There are two basic ways to configure a static route for Cisco IOS devices. I've written this article to highlight a case study comparing the configuration of a static route using the next-hop IP and the configuration of a static route using an outg…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

825 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question