<div>
And now that &quot;caching&quot; the data on server side has been suggested for some times, I'd like to add some links, for your information:<br />
<a href="http://www.asp101.com/articles/john/server_side_caching/index.asp" rel="ugc">http://www.asp101.com/articles/john/server_side_caching/index.asp</a><br />
<a href="http://www.asp101.com/articles/contrib/pagecaching.asp" rel="ugc">http://www.asp101.com/articles/contrib/pagecaching.asp</a>
</div>


And now that "caching" the data on server side has been suggested for some times, I'd like to add some links, for your information:
http://www.asp101.com/articles/john/server_side_caching/index.asp [http://www.asp101.com/articles/john/server_side_caching/index.asp]
http://www.asp101.com/articles/contrib/pagecaching.asp [http://www.asp101.com/articles/contrib/pagecaching.asp]

<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
Hi all<br />
Just wondering, how much better is using disconnected recordsets over connected recordsets and are they worth using?? Like, could the system support 1.5 times as many users simply by implementing this conversion?<br />
Thanks <br />
ant
</div>
</div>


Hi all
Just wondering, how much better is using disconnected recordsets over connected recordsets and are they worth using?? Like, could the system support 1.5 times as many users simply by implementing this conversion?
Thanks 
ant

Disconnected Recordsets - Performance Benefits and Disadvantages

Active Server Pages (ASP) is Microsoft’s first server-side engine for dynamic web pages. ASP’s support of the Component Object Model (COM) enables it to access and use compiled libraries such as DLLs. It has been superseded by ASP.NET, but will be supported by Internet Information Services (IIS) through at least 2022.