Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Cisco GBIC interface

Posted on 2006-07-05
4
Medium Priority
?
788 Views
Last Modified: 2008-03-06
Have 5 cisco switches

1 Cisco 3512
2 Cisco 3548
2 Cisco 3550

Up until last week, I only had 1 3550 for a total of 4 switches.  These 4 switches were all connected via the GBIC interface, with the cable that looks like a firewire cable.

Now I'm trying to install this newest 3550.  I want to hook it up to the existing 4 switches by means of the same type of GBIC interface.  However, as soon as I hook up the GBIC's and power on the new switch, it immediately takes one of the other switches offline. (Haven't narrowed down which one yet).

I should also mention that the existing 4 switches are setup as a cluster, with the existing 3550 as the cluster commander.

I've already connected to the new switch via the console port, gone through the initial setup, assign a unique IP address, setup passwords and so on.

Currently the new switch is up and running, but it's connected to the existing switches via a normal CAT 5 cross-over cable, through one of the ordinary ethernet ports.  This will work, but needless to say, transfer speeds won't be great once this switch becomes loaded.

So basically, I need to know what kind of limitations come with the GBIC interface method.  Is what I'm trying to do even possible?  If so, what am I doing wrong?


0
Comment
Question by:psueoc
4 Comments
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:Rick Hobbs
ID: 17046277
It can be done.  Post your configs.
0
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
Scotty_cisco earned 2000 total points
ID: 17046396
The 3548's and 3512's had what was called giga stack ports your firewire ports as you put it.  the 3550 I am assuming you bought a gigstack port for it as well?  If this is the case do you have a spanning-tree loop?

show spanning-tree blockedports this could be shutting down one of the ports the GIGA stack ports are a bit picky and are only 1/2 duplex if connected to more than one switch at a time so transfer rates are not going to be that much different you will see a bit slower speeds but I would recommend upgrading all the gigastack ports to a true GBIC with a COPPER ethernet cable would improve performance and be full duplex also eliminate problems with spanning tree if you happen to be looping an exisiting GBIC.

Thanks
Scott
0

Featured Post

[Webinar] Cloud Security

In this webinar you will learn:

-Why existing firewall and DMZ architectures are not suited for securing cloud applications
-How to make your enterprise “Cloud Ready”, and fix your aging DMZ architecture
-How to transform your enterprise and become a Cloud Enabler

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

While it is possible to put two routes in place with the secondary having a higher metric, this may not always work. In the event of a failure that does not bring down the physical interface on the router the primary route is not removed. There is a…
Creating an OSPF network that automatically (dynamically) reroutes network traffic over other connections to prevent network downtime.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

916 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question