Solved

glibc compatibility in Linux distributions

Posted on 2006-07-05
5
489 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-16
I administer a system building a large suite of programs written in C.
We develop/qa and build the applications on Linux.
Because of customer server Linux compatibility, we build our applications on Redhat 7.3 (for glibc 2.2 compatibility).
These applications run on all of our customers Intel Linux boxes.

However, I now want to make the minimum supported glibc 2.3, so I can upgrade our build boxes (as the 7.3 is getting unmaintainable).
We will inform all glibc 2.2 customers that they have to upgrade (before next release).
So in summary, I have customers on glibc 2.2 (who will have to upgrade), and customers on glibc 2.3 upwards.

My question: what operating system does anyone recommend I move my build servers to? They have to be running an early version of glibc2.3 (or should I just build a glibc -haven't done that before - I guess it has caveats).

Regards,
Ian.
0
Comment
Question by:kiwiplan
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 87

Accepted Solution

by:
rindi earned 125 total points
ID: 17048619
You could stay with redhat, but go RHES 4.3, and if you want to keep it free, get the clone of RH from CentOS.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:pjedmond
pjedmond earned 125 total points
ID: 17048776
Do not go to RHEL 4.3 without comprehensive testing......but you were going to do that anyway:) - There are too many fundamental changes. In particularly the switch from XFree to Xorg if you've got any GUI to your applications. Although this may not be directly responsible for your applications breaking, the knock on effect with the Xorg interface rather than the XFree causes numerous tiny little differences any one of which may 'break' your software.

Obviously, you are going to test all your software on the 'new' distro, but even with compat rpms, I expect that you'll find a few glitches.

I'd recommend going for the latest in the RHEL 3 series (Obviously CentOS or any of the RH clones is a viable alternative).

(   (()
(`-' _\
 ''  ''
0
 
LVL 22

Expert Comment

by:pjedmond
ID: 17048787
Another major issue is that from RHEL3 to RHEL 4, RH dropped a number of modules from the kernel. Although you can always rebuild the kernel, this is unnecessary hassle for your customers. Main module problem that I've experienced with the RH3->RH4 upgrade was the removal of the megaRAID module (most older HP systems with RAID!)

(   (()
(`-' _\
 ''  ''

0

Featured Post

IT, Stop Being Called Into Every Meeting

Highfive is so simple that setting up every meeting room takes just minutes and every employee will be able to start or join a call from any room with ease. Never be called into a meeting just to get it started again. This is how video conferencing should work!

Join & Write a Comment

If you have a server on collocation with the super-fast CPU, that doesn't mean that you get it running at full power. Here is a preamble. When doing inventory of Linux servers, that I'm administering, I've found that some of them are running on l…
Introduction We as admins face situation where we need to redirect websites to another. This may be required as a part of an upgrade keeping the old URL but website should be served from new URL. This document would brief you on different ways ca…
Learn how to get help with Linux/Unix bash shell commands. Use help to read help documents for built in bash shell commands.: Use man to interface with the online reference manuals for shell commands.: Use man to search man pages for unknown command…
This demo shows you how to set up the containerized NetScaler CPX with NetScaler Management and Analytics System in a non-routable Mesos/Marathon environment for use with Micro-Services applications.

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

14 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now