Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 395
  • Last Modified:

What is the best migration path from SDLT 320 ?

Dear all,

This has probably been asked over the years time and time again, but thats down to advancments in technology.

I have just spoken to a few of my suppliers about a SDLT320 tape drive for our DR site and i have been told they are end of life.

The requirement is to backup 300GB of data from a compaq server that is our main file server, from ArcServe in the usual over night GFS backup routines. However we need to restore this data in our DR site should we need to.

My question is this, should i stick with the 'DLT' track and go with the SDLTII (300GB native) or choose something else such as ultrium. What are the Pro's and cons of different technologies

Im not to bothered about previous backups as we will have the old drives around should we need to restore older tapes.

Real world views appreciated.

Psyc
0
Psyco_666
Asked:
Psyco_666
  • 2
  • 2
1 Solution
 
Duncan MeyersCommented:
Check out the new DTL-S4 drives. They handle 800GB native...
http://www.quantum.com/Products/TapeDrives/DLT/dlt-s4/Index.aspx

According to the manual (http://downloads.quantum.com/dlt_s4/Product_Manual_8127801.pdf), they'll read your existing SDLT 320 tapes, but you'll need to buy new media to write to.

Ultriums and DLTs offer similar features, but LTO-3 tape drives have a *major* drawback. Both SDLT and LTO drives feature variable speed tape transports so that the drive can match the tape speed to the rate of incoming data during write operations. The big difference lies in the minimum tape speed - the LTO-3 drive's minimum speed is much higher than a DLT-S4 or LTO-2, meaning that the drive spends a lot of time waiting for data to write - it then writes the data out to tape, repositions the tape and waits for its data buffers to fill before it writes out the next block - this process is referred to as "shoe-shining". A DLT-4S or LTO-2 can slow the tape speed down so that it matches the incoming data rate, so the data is streamed directly out to tape. The upshot of all this is that if you have LTO-3 and your backup software cannot provide multiple streams to your tape drive, you will get shoeshing, which affects both perormance and tape drive reliability. Enterprise level backup software that can handle multiple streams includes Symantec NetBackup, EMC Networker and Commvault Galaxy. If you have a product like Arcserve or BackupExec which handle single data streams, then you're much better off with DLT-S4 or LTO-2.

To conclude, I'd recommend DLT-S4 for performance and teh convenience of read compatibility with your existing tapes.
0
 
dooleydogCommented:
External USB HDD - once a week.

Good Luck,
0
 
Psyco_666Author Commented:
dooleydog, once a week is not going to cut it im afraid. We have 2 tapes at the moment on a nightly basis. On stays onsite and one goes offsite for DR reasons.
0
 
Psyco_666Author Commented:
Thanks for the concise awnser meyersd!
0
 
Duncan MeyersCommented:
My pleasure!
0

Featured Post

NFR key for Veeam Agent for Linux

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license for one year.  It allows for the non‑production use and valid for five workstations and two servers. Veeam Agent for Linux is a simple backup tool for your Linux installations, both on‑premises and in the public cloud.

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now