Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of dprenevost
dprenevostFlag for United States of America

asked on

License confusion. SBS2003 and 2003 enterprise server.

Do I need to buy seperate cals for the 2003 enterprise server if I have the appropriate number of cals for the SBS?
SOLUTION
Avatar of NAORC
NAORC

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of dprenevost

ASKER

I live in the states will they be able to help me?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
cheers!
Avatar of Jeffrey Kane - TechSoEasy
I really hate to correct you all, but you DON'T have to buy additional CALs for additional Windows Servers on the network.  They are already covered!

Please see this SBS blog post regarding the issue:
http://blogs.msdn.com/mssmallbiz/archive/2006/06/23/644308.aspx

Jeff
TechSoEasy
Thanks, but we were not refering to sbs r2.  the old rules still apply for regular sbs 2003...

so no reason to hate...  8oP
This definitely falls under Simon's three rules of software licensing...

http://www.sembee.co.uk/archive/2006/07/02/20.aspx

Simon.
I didn't say that you WERE referring to R2.  The blog post that I referred you to describes BOTH.  Please review it again.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
And Sembee... while I defer to you on many items... I disagree about your Rule #3.  Usually the most expensive option is a mistake made by someone misinterpreting licensing.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
I talked to a Microsoft rep today and he said that the SBS 2003 R2 model of the license is the only one that covers any other type of server.

I can ony assume that he knew what he was talking about...unless he was lying...

Thanks for all your input!

Dan
I do see where the blog mentions that you are covered by the regular 2003 sbs cals for the other member servers.  just fyi I know you wernt making it up.
He wasn't lying, he just misunderstood the facts.

Jeff
TechSoEasy