Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

SQL Server 2000 Load balancing

Posted on 2006-07-15
4
Medium Priority
?
437 Views
Last Modified: 2011-09-20
Hello experts,

We are starting with a new project that I'll describe here and I need your advice.
It is a web based application that will have a lot of hits (around 2000 per second). We plan to have one SQL Server 2000 machine and two web servers with hardware load balancer for those two web servers. That configuration should be enough for the first phase (when not that much hits will happen).

What we want is to be able to easily extend our configuration by adding additional SQL Servers. For example: when we notice that our system becomes slower then we would like to add one more server machine which would host another instance of SQL Server 2000.
I read a little about SQL Server clustering but I'm not sure if what I need is possible. I want to have two or more SQL Servers running at the same time where all SQL servers are primary servers - I mean, I don't want to have a failover clustering which would assure that in case of a problem with one server the other one can be used. I would like to have real load balanced SQL Servers.

Is that possible to do with SQL Server 2000? Should we have some additional hardware for that?

Thank you all in advance!
0
Comment
Question by:sasapopovic
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 143

Accepted Solution

by:
Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3] earned 2000 total points
ID: 17113651
0
 
LVL 9

Author Comment

by:sasapopovic
ID: 17113687
Hi angelIII,

Thank you for fast answer.
Can you just confirm to me that out-of-the-box solutions for load balancing does not exist in MS SQL Server 2000? Do you know if that is possible in SQL Server 2005?

If it is not possible in SQL Server 2000 and not in SQL Server 2005 then I would probably go with suggested spliting of OLTP and reporting functionalities using "Transactional replication". Do you have such experience and what would be your favorite?

Thank you so far.
0
 
LVL 143

Expert Comment

by:Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3]
ID: 17114007
There is indeed nothing "out-of-the-box" in sql server 2000.
I don't have experience with this, but I know that the choice depends alot on the constraints on what is needed and what budget you have.
0
 
LVL 9

Author Comment

by:sasapopovic
ID: 17114104
Thank you again angelIII!
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Recently, Microsoft released a best-practice guide for securing Active Directory. It's a whopping 300+ pages long. Those of us tasked with securing our company’s databases and systems would, ideally, have time to devote to learning the ins and outs…
What we learned in Webroot's webinar on multi-vector protection.
In this video, Percona Solution Engineer Dimitri Vanoverbeke discusses why you want to use at least three nodes in a database cluster. To discuss how Percona Consulting can help with your design and architecture needs for your database and infras…
In this video, Percona Director of Solution Engineering Jon Tobin discusses the function and features of Percona Server for MongoDB. How Percona can help Percona can help you determine if Percona Server for MongoDB is the right solution for …

715 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question