<div>
Of course it does, I only recommended you :)<br />
<br />
On another note, it makes the moderators job easier if there are no comments after the recommendation - so, for their benefit, please only post objections.<br />
<br />
Just so you know, I am glad you have (so far) appreciated my recommendations :))<br />
<br />
-red
</div>


Of course it does, I only recommended you :)

On another note, it makes the moderators job easier if there are no comments after the recommendation - so, for their benefit, please only post objections.

Just so you know, I am glad you have (so far) appreciated my recommendations :))

-red

<div>
OK, sorry. &nbsp;In other TA's when not posting an &quot;OK&quot; I've found someone else will instead and the user comes back and selects it or the Q still dies a death. &nbsp;Guess you are more efficient than that around here :-)<br />
<br />
Steve
</div>


OK, sorry.  In other TA's when not posting an "OK" I've found someone else will instead and the user comes back and selects it or the Q still dies a death.  Guess you are more efficient than that around here :-)

Steve

<div>
&gt;&gt;I've found someone else will instead and the user comes back and selects it<br />
<br />
I don't deal with that at all :)<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
<br />
-red
</div>


>>I've found someone else will instead and the user comes back and selects it

I don't deal with that at all :)

Thanks

-red

<div>
<div class="content wysiwyg-content">
Have a two node W2K3 cluster. &nbsp;Currently using it as a file sever active/passive. &nbsp;Quick question about the owners<br />
<br />
Cluster Group Owner = NODE1<br />
File Resources Owner = NODE2<br />
<br />
We are having a debate, &nbsp;is the best practice to have one node to be the owner of all the groups or does it not matter if the two nodes own different groups. &nbsp;<br />
<br />
They are not serving up/owning the same groups. &nbsp;I have seen it done both ways. &nbsp;Just wondering what is better.<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
MK
</div>
</div>


Have a two node W2K3 cluster.  Currently using it as a file sever active/passive.  Quick question about the owners

Cluster Group Owner = NODE1
File Resources Owner = NODE2

We are having a debate,  is the best practice to have one node to be the owner of all the groups or does it not matter if the two nodes own different groups.  

They are not serving up/owning the same groups.  I have seen it done both ways.  Just wondering what is better.

Thanks
MK

Cluster Group Owner

The term "Backup" means the methods and processes involved to copy computer data (system data as well as application data) to media other than the ones where the data originally live (disk, tape, optical, cloud). "Restore" in turn means the methods and processes involved in data recovery, i. e., bringing back copied computer data to their original location. Backup/Restore primarily serves as a means of protection against data loss, be it due to disaster, corruption or sabotage. It can also be used for recovering data from an earlier point in time and even for cloning machines or applications. There is a wide variety of backup/restore software available, from expensive commercial products to free or open source tools.

Storage Software

Windows Server 2003 was based on Windows XP and was released in four editions: Web, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter. It also had derivative versions for clusters, storage and Microsoft’s Small Business Server. Important upgrades included integrating Internet Information Services (IIS), improvements to Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP), and the migration to Automated System Recovery (ASR).