?
Solved

Intellisense not finding my method

Posted on 2006-07-16
9
Medium Priority
?
221 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-16
Here's my class

     public class GetListURLs
    {
 
       private string _ConnString;

        public GetListURLs(string connection)
        {
            this._ConnString = connection;
        }

        public DataSet GetList()
        {
            DataSet URLs = new DataSet();
            SqlConnection Conn = new SqlConnection(this._ConnString);
            try
            {

                SqlCommand GetURLsCommand = new SqlCommand("GetURLs", Conn);
                GetURLsCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
                SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(GetURLsCommand);
                da.Fill(URLs);
               
                return URLs;
               
            }
            catch
            {
                return null;
            }
            finally
            {
                Conn.Close();
            }
        }
    }
}

In my aspx code-behind, I can't get to my GetURLs() using Intellisense.

I type DataSet urls = GetListURLs.   in my page_load and the only options I get after the dot are "Equals" or  "ReferenceEquals"

I have added my Class Library dll into my web site and the using namespace is working for the class library.  It is recognizing my class GetListURLs, just not my GetURLs() and I'm not sure why.
0
Comment
Question by:dba123
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 3
9 Comments
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:paulb1989
ID: 17119180
Did you create an instance of your class in order to access the methods?

For example:

GetListURLs instance = new GetListURLs("Value");
DataSet whatever = instance.GetList();
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119191
this is what I did in the page_load of my code-behind:

        GetListURLs geturls = new GetListURLs(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MyConn"]);
        DataSet urls = GetList();

        VPPURLList.DataSource = urls;
        VPPURLList.DataBind();
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119197
I tried this now, but it still doesn't give GetList() in the Intellisence:

        GetListURLs geturls = new GetListURLs(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["JDVConn"]);
        DataSet urls = geturls.

        VPPURLList.DataSource = urls;
        VPPURLList.DataBind();

The options I get after geturls.  are now "Equals", "GetHashCode", "GetList", "GetType", "ToString"

where's my function, ahh!
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
paulb1989 earned 2000 total points
ID: 17119232
The options I get after geturls.  are now "Equals", "GetHashCode", "GetList", "GetType", "ToString"

Your method is right there: "GetList"
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119291
Duh, it's right there, nevermind.  I was looking for the () but it doesn't show that for methods from your class I guess in Intellisense
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119309
but, now I have:

public partial class _Index : System.Web.UI.Page
{
    protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        GetListURLs geturls = new GetListURLs(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MyConn"]);

        VPPURLList.DataSource = geturls.GetList;
        VPPURLList.DataBind();
    }
}

and get this error:

Cannot convert method group 'GetList' to non-delegate type 'object'. Did you intend to invoke the method?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119313
If it shows up in Intellisense as GetList, do I need to ad ()?  how weird.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:paulb1989
ID: 17119316
you forgot the brackets:

VPPURLList.DataSource = geturls.GetList();

They don't show up in intellisense but you still have to type them.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:dba123
ID: 17119318
ok, thanks, didn't know that.  Thanks a lot!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Summary: Persistence is the capability of an application to store the state of objects and recover it when necessary. This article compares the two common types of serialization in aspects of data access, readability, and runtime cost. A ready-to…
It was really hard time for me to get the understanding of Delegates in C#. I went through many websites and articles but I found them very clumsy. After going through those sites, I noted down the points in a easy way so here I am sharing that unde…
This is my first video review of Microsoft Bookings, I will be doing a part two with a bit more information, but wanted to get this out to you folks.
Sometimes it takes a new vantage point, apart from our everyday security practices, to truly see our Active Directory (AD) vulnerabilities. We get used to implementing the same techniques and checking the same areas for a breach. This pattern can re…
Suggested Courses

801 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question