Jehovahd
asked on
Network Operating Systems differences and/or Similarities
What are some some differences and/or similarities between network operating systems? Which two would you reccommend? and Why?
Perferably these: Linux, Microsoft 2000, MVS, OS/400 and AIX.
Perferably these: Linux, Microsoft 2000, MVS, OS/400 and AIX.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Try here for more:
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/21356888/network-operating-system.html?query=&clearTAFilter=true
may u please send me information on different types of network operating systems preferbly windows 2000 server, unix and linux ., i need to make a comparison , im looking for the best NOS to use which can effectively support 10 000 users.
Questions Asked 1
Administrative Comment > it is now classified as abandoned.
> PAQed with no points refunded (of 500)
> This solution was worth 0 Points and received a grade of A
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/21356888/network-operating-system.html?query=&clearTAFilter=true
may u please send me information on different types of network operating systems preferbly windows 2000 server, unix and linux ., i need to make a comparison , im looking for the best NOS to use which can effectively support 10 000 users.
Questions Asked 1
Administrative Comment > it is now classified as abandoned.
> PAQed with no points refunded (of 500)
> This solution was worth 0 Points and received a grade of A
Sorry, DOS is not NOS even where two or three DOS machines are connected.
> UniSys is actually the best, with close seconds of perhaps Cray, IBM, and others, followed by the pc
HaHaHa, those are NOS? And you complain about Wiki?
Describe fit of AppleTalk, APPN, DECnet, LAN Manager, LAN Server, LANtastic, Pathworks, SNA, TSO, Vines
> Title: Network Operating Systems differences and/or Similarities
Interesting, the way same question is asked more than once
Jehovahd
Registration Date 07/20/2006
Questions Answered 0
Questions Participated 0
Comments Posted 0
Questions Asked 1
Questions Open 1
Questions Graded 0
> UniSys is actually the best, with close seconds of perhaps Cray, IBM, and others, followed by the pc
HaHaHa, those are NOS? And you complain about Wiki?
Describe fit of AppleTalk, APPN, DECnet, LAN Manager, LAN Server, LANtastic, Pathworks, SNA, TSO, Vines
> Title: Network Operating Systems differences and/or Similarities
Interesting, the way same question is asked more than once
Jehovahd
Registration Date 07/20/2006
Questions Answered 0
Questions Participated 0
Comments Posted 0
Questions Asked 1
Questions Open 1
Questions Graded 0
Yes, they are Network Operating Systems.
" Sorry, DOS is not NOS even where two or three DOS machines are connected."
That's because you don't know what Disk Operating System [DOS] means. Apparently, Drs. Weiss and Wirth taught me a little differently about the way their inventions [disks, the fathers of all hard drives] stored code and data, Eckert & Mauchly added the mechanism to boot from the disk, and the first Disk Operating System was born.
IBM didn't have this concept down until late in the 1970's, they were still running batch.
All of the companies you mention either didn't exist, or, they were waiting to be taught how to network, especially Digital Equipment Corporation [pdp11 on up]. Vax, if you look it up, is a clone of UniVac, see the similarities to the first network comptuer, Illiac?
The best one to handle 10,000 accounts comes from the company that first had 10,000 accounts on a network. Whether it's their mainframe, hybrid, or microprocessor based, which is why AOL, Microsoft, and your government are still using them.
And they handle millions of accounts, perhaps more than a billion, worldwide.
Was that funny to you?
Wiki is a new kid on the block, who hasn't done any college level research work yet.
" Sorry, DOS is not NOS even where two or three DOS machines are connected."
That's because you don't know what Disk Operating System [DOS] means. Apparently, Drs. Weiss and Wirth taught me a little differently about the way their inventions [disks, the fathers of all hard drives] stored code and data, Eckert & Mauchly added the mechanism to boot from the disk, and the first Disk Operating System was born.
IBM didn't have this concept down until late in the 1970's, they were still running batch.
All of the companies you mention either didn't exist, or, they were waiting to be taught how to network, especially Digital Equipment Corporation [pdp11 on up]. Vax, if you look it up, is a clone of UniVac, see the similarities to the first network comptuer, Illiac?
The best one to handle 10,000 accounts comes from the company that first had 10,000 accounts on a network. Whether it's their mainframe, hybrid, or microprocessor based, which is why AOL, Microsoft, and your government are still using them.
And they handle millions of accounts, perhaps more than a billion, worldwide.
Was that funny to you?
Wiki is a new kid on the block, who hasn't done any college level research work yet.
So click on 'edit'