Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of fluffyfrog
fluffyfrogFlag for United States of America

asked on

Cisco 2924 VLAN2 Administratively Down

Hello,
I have a Cisco 2924 switch configured with a  second VLAN to host a subnet used for a Microsoft Exchange Cluster Hearbeat only. It seems to be working because the NIC's on the VLAN2 are able to communicate with eachother, but it shows a status of 'Administratively Down' when the configuration is displayed. I've tried logging on to the interface and setting the 'no shutdown' command, but the status does not change. Any advice?
Thanks

Jeff



mosc2924#sho run
Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname mosc2924
!
enable secret 5 $1$MK12$Ws9ROqTnBBdbpbO7Ibi/01
!
!
!
!
!
!
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
!
interface FastEthernet0/3
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/4
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/5
!
interface FastEthernet0/6
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/7
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/8
!
interface FastEthernet0/9
!
interface FastEthernet0/10
!
interface FastEthernet0/11
!
interface FastEthernet0/12
!
interface FastEthernet0/13
 duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet0/14
!
interface FastEthernet0/15
!
interface FastEthernet0/16
!
interface FastEthernet0/17
 duplex full
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface FastEthernet0/18
 duplex full
 switchport access vlan 2
!
interface FastEthernet0/19
!
interface FastEthernet0/20
!
interface FastEthernet0/21
!
interface FastEthernet0/22
!
interface FastEthernet0/23
!
interface FastEthernet0/24
!
interface FastEthernet1/1
!
interface FastEthernet1/2
!
interface VLAN1
 ip address 192.168.1.248 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
!
interface VLAN2
 ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
 shutdown
!
interface VLAN3
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no ip route-cache
 shutdown
!
ip default-gateway 192.168.1.254
snmp-server engineID local 00000009020000307BDEFF00
snmp-server community private RW
snmp-server community public RO
!
line con 0
 transport input none
 stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
 password 7 0506051C241E1E594B
 login
line vty 5 15
 password 7 0506051C241E1E594B
 login
!
ntp clock-period 22518413
ntp server 192.168.1.215 source VLAN1
ntp server 192.168.1.254 prefer
end

mosc2924#
Avatar of pseudocyber
pseudocyber

Do you have an active device on the vlan?  I've seen them not come up until there's an active device there.
Did you try the noshut on the VLan interface (in case you didn't...):
>  enable
>  {password}
>  int vlan2
>  no shut

Also, check and see if VLAN2 is in the VLan Database...  
>  enable
>  {password}
>  vlan database
>  vlan 2 name {descriptive name, like "Heartbeat"}
>  exit
>  copy run star
* one interface assigned to the vlan must have link established,
* the vlan2 SVI you defined needs 'no shutdown'
* note that you aren't going to be able to route with a 2924 (layer-2 only switch)
Avatar of fluffyfrog

ASKER

Thanks for your responses, I'll answer accordingly...

pseudocyber - Yes, I have two NIC's connected to the VLAN for the purpose of cluster hearbeat.

scooteranderson - Yup, ran the 'no shut' command and also checked the vlan database and it is present

jeffkell - no routing necessary, the vlan is just to segregate traffic for a cluster heartbeat

**Just to reiterate my point from above, VLAN2 seems to be working, the NIC's are passing traffic, but the VLAN is listed as shutdown when viewing the config.

Thanks again.
the old 2924XL may only let you have one active SVI (you don't need the SVI if you're trunking vlan2 out of the switch)
Avatar of Les Moore
Just to be clear - you *cannot* have two vlan interfaces active simultaneously on a 2924XL.
Whichever vlan is currently active is considered your "management" vlan
Performing a "no shut" on either interface automatically shuts the other one down. This is by design.
This vlan interface is for no other purpose than for managing the switch itself
There is absolutely no chance to enable them both and try to route between them. This is *not* a layer 3 switch
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Les Moore
Les Moore
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial