Solved

inheritence quickie

Posted on 2006-07-24
4
229 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-16
hi

i have an abstract base class "Base1.cs"

i have another concrete class "Organisation.cs" that inherits "Base1.cs"  Organisation : Base1

i have other classes that use Organisation.cs.

i want those classes that use Organisation.cs to be able to use "Base1.cs" methods but only via Organisation.cs.

What is the most appropriate scope i should give the methods on Base1.cs.

public ?  (this seems abit too general?)

thanks v much.

p.s - i know it cant be protected.


 
0
Comment
Question by:MrKevorkian
4 Comments
 

Expert Comment

by:muskok
ID: 17167753
You have to make the methods in Base1 protected and provide public methods in Organisation class. These public methods will call Base1's protected methods.
0
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:apresto
ID: 17167767
Hi MrKevorkian,

You could created some Protected Properties in the Organisation class then anything that inherits Organsiation will be able to see those properties, which inturn look at inherited members from Base1

Apresto
0
 
LVL 13

Accepted Solution

by:
devsolns earned 400 total points
ID: 17168052
I would NOT recommend using protected scope.  In true OOP you should be able to do just fine without.  You state that you want derived classes to be able to use base1 methods but only by going through Organisation.  This is happening already because you made Base1 abstract.  No one will be able to instantiate that object and access its methods directly, only classes derived from that Base1 class can do so.  You'll also be missing out of many advantages of polymorphism and therefor questioning the use of inheritance here.

There are some good uses for protected accessibilty.  For example your event invoker methods.  You dont want to make them public but certainly want to provider accessibility for your derived classes to invoke directly so protected works.

Take care,
gp
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:MrKevorkian
ID: 17168117
i have decided to leave them public.  
i thought there might be another key word that was more suitable, but if there isnt thats fine.
i didnt really want to put extra properties on organisation.cs

thanks everyone.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

In order to hide the "ugly" records selectors (triangles) in the rowheaders, here are some suggestions. Microsoft doesn't have a direct method/property to do it. You can only hide the rowheader column. First solution, the easy way The first sol…
It was really hard time for me to get the understanding of Delegates in C#. I went through many websites and articles but I found them very clumsy. After going through those sites, I noted down the points in a easy way so here I am sharing that unde…
This Micro Tutorial will teach you how to censor certain areas of your screen. The example in this video will show a little boy's face being blurred. This will be demonstrated using Adobe Premiere Pro CS6.
Learn how to create flexible layouts using relative units in CSS.  New relative units added in CSS3 include vw(viewports width), vh(viewports height), vmin(minimum of viewports height and width), and vmax (maximum of viewports height and width).

867 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

23 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now