[Last Call] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 651
  • Last Modified:

Windows 2003 Server -- SAN -- RAID 10 -- Volume Limit

EE,

We have an 84TB RAID 10 SAN and I was wondering on a Windows 2003 Server if the limit of a single volume can surpass the 2TB limitation of NTFS? I know we have some smaller systems using PCi-X cards RAID cards using RAID 6 and have volumes over 3GBS...
0
Clownzer
Asked:
Clownzer
  • 3
1 Solution
 
Chris GralikeSpecialistCommented:
i think this document will help you on this item ;)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/140365/

0
 
Chris GralikeSpecialistCommented:
please be aware that changing the cluster size will make the waste of effective diskspace larger, and also will fragment the disk faster. This might mean that a file of a size say 1050 bytes will consume 2048bytes effectivly on a NTFS partition wich has a cluster size of 1024. This might not be a big problem if the files that are stored on this disk are huge in comparison but might be a waste when you have allot of tiny files saved on that particular partition.

Every advantage has a disadvantage ;-)

regards,
0
 
Chris GralikeSpecialistCommented:
Lol and select "I disagree strongly" on the Microsoft documents, might force them to use the Inode system linux uses lol! ;-)
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Add Premium security features to your question to ensure its privacy or anonymity. Learn more about your ability to control Question Security today.

  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now