We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Convert SQL expressions to dBase expressions?

cricketman
cricketman used Ask the Experts™
on
Need to write some simple dBase expressions for a filter in Goldmine to filter all records that have been updated in the last year.  I can struggle thru them in SQL, but Goldmine has to have a dBase equivalent expression to make it work.

Here's what I have in SQL:

WHERE c1.LASTDATE >= DATEADD(dd,-365,GETDATE())

Is there any software that could take an SQL expression like this & show me the dBase equivalent?

Thanks.....
Comment
Watch Question

Do more with

Expert Office
EXPERT OFFICE® is a registered trademark of EXPERTS EXCHANGE®
I know of no magic bullet software.

As far as an expression for dBASE, dBASE likes to see a FOR construct in its queries.

Simply try that same construct withjust the SQL WHERE keyword in your Goldmine expression builder.

This logocal condition would be added to the the dBASE FOR clause:
c1.LASTDATE >= DATEADD(dd,-365,GETDATE())

Since the success of the query depends on entities it works on being active, it could fail.  But, you need to find that out by testing it.  IOW, is "c1" an active/open table or is it an alias supplied to SQL?  Is GETDATE() an available function call?  Is DATEADD() also an available function that can get executed to return a real date that can be evaluated?

Author

Commented:
GM must actually "assume" the WHERE and FOR commands, as when I looked at the SQL query again it really was just:

c1.LASTDATE >= DATEADD(dd,-365,GETDATE())

Through trial & error I figured out what I needed in the dBase expression to match it, which is:

DtoS(contact1->lastdate) >= DtoS(DATE()-365)

Got it working.... still hoping someone will point me towards a solution that I can use routinely.  If not "magic software"... perhaps just a list of comparable expressions?  (... "this" in SWQL = "this" in dBase, etc).

Thanks....
Have you determined that the use of DtoS() is absolutely necessary?  It seems that the comparison of dates without that string conversion should work just fine and the DtoS() may be redundant.

Also, I see c1 was an alias for contact1.

Author

Commented:
NO, don't know if it is absolutely necessary or not... just copied it from another GM filter that was working, and played with the syntax till I got the expected results.

And yes, c1 was an alias for table contact1.