Solved

Setting up remote users for MS Exchange (XP clients using MS Outlook)

Posted on 2006-10-24
2
235 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
My company has evolved a truly haphazard system for giving remote users access to their e-mails.  With new staff joining in the next few weeks, I'd like to clean up how we provide access to e-mail for remote users.

At present we have a Windows 2000 server, running MS Exchange 5.5 and this serves all of our local users very well.
We also have a small number of remote users who have been provided with a number of schemes to access their e-mails.
Some have stand-alone POP3 mail accounts to which company e-mails are automatically copied using MS Exchange.
Others connect to local PCs using VPN/remote desktop in order to have remote access to their e-mails.
Others still connect to our Exchange server via VPN and synchronise their local copies of e-mail.

Using what we have, (remote XP clients running MS Outlook, a working VPN, a Windows 2000 domain with MS Exchange 5.5), how should our system be best reconfigured to provide the most reasonable centralised mail service?  I am aware of Outlook Web Access (which publishes the user's mailboxes as a web application to be used via a web browser).  If this is my best option, so be it, however, I'd prefer for my remote users to be able to access their mail via the MS Outlook mail client (either the version with Office 2000 or Office XP) - ideally with offline access to their mailstore.

One limitation which may or may not affect this: for compatibility reasons, we are currently not able to run the SMTP service on the MS Exchange server (it's presence on the server crashes a business-critical legacy system).  If this service is part of the best solution, I'll reinvestigate this.

Any suggestions?
0
Comment
Question by:Beamson
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
Chris Staunton earned 250 total points
ID: 17796178
It sounds as though you've pretty much done what you can with Exchange 5.5, with the latest version of Exchange 2003 and the newer 2007 version coming soon there are many more features that you could utilize to give your users a better Outlook experience.  There is the ability to access you server via HTTP which tunnels the exchange connection.  You might also want to look at upgrading to Outlook 2003 as there are many ways for it to work in "Offline" mode using a cached copy of the users mailbox on the local machine.

As MS has already phazed out Exchannge 5.5 from its supported applications it would be wise to upgrade to the latest and greatest, you might also look at doing a dedicated Exchange server so you don't run into the SMTP problem that you're currently experiencing.


Cheers,


Shoota
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Beamson
ID: 17796703
Thanks Shoota,

I think that confirms pretty much what I was expecting.  Was worried that there might be a more obvious way around the problem that I was missing but probably not.

At present, I'm trialing the use of a VPN-based solution and it seems reasonably good.  I've set my home router to have an always-on VPN connection to the office.  With this active, I can boot my remote PC and get authenticated by the works domain servers.  That done, I can use a local Outlook client, pretty much the same as if I was at the office.

Synchronising an offline copy seems a bit haphazard (40mins of watching a progress bar first time - hopefully will improve).   That done, it still seems to want to use the server based copy when online and opening mail or attachments.

I don't know how scalable it is going to be to have 4 more remote workers with always on VPNs to our office.  Will have to experiment.  They don't need to be always on but asking them to connect/disconnect the VPN each time they want to perform a mail-related task is not ideal, though they would have to manually instigate a VPN connection when away from home or office.

As you say, a seperate mail server would untie some of our constraints and upgrades to latest versions are not unthinkable (though I suspect our small business' management would prefer otherwise!).

I'll keep this post open a little longer in case more wisdom comes my way, otherwsise will award the points.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article is in response to a question (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Networking/Network_Management/Network_Analysis/Q_28230497.html) here at Experts Exchange. The Original Poster (OP) requires a utility that will accept a list of IP addresses …
A common practice in small networks is making file sharing easy which works extremely well when intra-network security is not an issue. In essence, everyone, that is "Everyone", is given access to all of the shared files - often the entire C: drive …
In this video, viewers are given an introduction to using the Windows 10 Snipping Tool, how to quickly locate it when it's needed and also how make it always available with a single click of a mouse button, by pinning it to the Desktop Task Bar. Int…
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…
Suggested Courses

632 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question