Solved

Active Directory failover not working as intended

Posted on 2006-10-25
3
235 Views
Last Modified: 2006-11-18
Hello,

We have a relatively small domain - 7 servers total with about 200 users...  All of our servers are running MS Windows Server 2003...  for lack of a better term our PDC (which I know doesn't exist anymore) is called MSDSB04.  It handles DNS as well as Active Directory and DHCP on the local LAN segment.

I have added two other Active Directory servers over the last year or so - the intent being that if something happened to MSDSB04 they would handle DNS and authentication requests seamlessly without any interruption of service to the LAN users... this has not worked...  When MSDSB04 goes offline - it kills the LAN.

What do I need to do to get these other servers to pick up the slack on demand?
0
Comment
Question by:iain_stephen
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 70

Accepted Solution

by:
Chris Dent earned 250 total points
ID: 17803466

Hey,

You need a few things.

You mentioned it, but didn't say whether or not the other servers were running the DNS Service? And if so, are they mentioned in your clients TCP/IP config?

One of the other most important things is that you set your servers to be Global Catalog, this is done through AD Sites and Services, then under your Site, Servers, your Server and the properties for NTDS Settings you should see a little tick box. There are no problems with you making all your Domain Controllers Global Catalog.

Chris
0
 

Author Comment

by:iain_stephen
ID: 17804013
Just a note - thank you for keeping it simple and not referring me to endless Microsoft KB articles... the key was the global catalog - it was only checked for the 'PDC' - not the other two servers...

I have done that now and will try it out tonight...

One other question - if you have the time - The original 'PDC' is also running DHCP for the local LAN segment...  should I be setting up any kind of failover for that?  Perhaps it would be best to move the DHCP function to the main router (default gateway)?
0
 
LVL 70

Expert Comment

by:Chris Dent
ID: 17812547

Possibly the best way to deal with DHCP is to split the scope up into two, then have one DHCP Server hand out the first half and another the second.

Works pretty well really.

Chris
0

Featured Post

How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

Join & Write a Comment

by Batuhan Cetin In this article I will be guiding through the process of removing a failed DC metadata from Active Directory (hereafter, AD) using the ntdsutil tool in a Windows Server 2003 environment. These steps are not necessary in a Win…
Many of us need to configure DHCP server(s) in their environment. We can do that simply via DHCP console on server or using MMC snap-in on each computer with Administrative Tools installed in a network. But what if we have to configure many DHCP ser…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…
You have products, that come in variants and want to set different prices for them? Watch this micro tutorial that describes how to configure prices for Magento super attributes. Assigning simple products to configurable: We assigned simple products…

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

23 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now