Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Group Policy, security filtering

Posted on 2006-10-25
2
Medium Priority
?
307 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-18
I have loopback policy enabled.

I am able to have users from the OU Users specified on say machines in OU SERVERS B using 'authetnicated users' as the filtering. All works great, computer GP and user GP works fine. Now when I remove authenticated users, and just add an invidiaul users, the GP doesn't apply to .. why is that?

OU users
OU computers
OU servers
      - OU SERVERS B
0
Comment
Question by:shankshank
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 85

Accepted Solution

by:
oBdA earned 2000 total points
ID: 17806376
If you remove "Authenticated Users" and only add individual users (and have the user settings in the same GPO as the loopback policy), you're blocking the *computer* (an "Authenticated User"!) from applying the loopback policy, which then in turn prevents the application of the user policies that rely on the loopback policy.
Either add the computer account to the security settings, or separate the computer policies (the loopback policy is one of those) and the user policies into different GPOs. The latter is usually the better choice; user settings and computer settings don't have too much in common, so it's easier to manage to keep them apart.
On a side note, unless there are really good reasons to do so (like home directories), you should never assign permissions directly to individual accounts. Create a dedicated group for each GPO (with a name reflecting the use), add the users to the group (and, yes, you can add computers to groups as well), assign the permissions to apply the GPO to the group.
0
 
LVL 5

Author Comment

by:shankshank
ID: 17806476
hahahahah.

stupidity at its best === > ME


thanks for clearing that up.. I just for some reason, after all the questions about this stuff, still a little confused, I 'assumed' that the policy would be in effect for the computer itself, since it was residing inside of the OU...


0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Organizations create, modify, and maintain huge amounts of data to help their businesses earn money and generally function.  Typically every network user within an organization has a bit of disk space to store in process items and personal files.   …
Recently, I had the need to build a standalone system to run a point-of-sale system. I’m running this on a low-voltage Atom processor, so I wanted a light-weight operating system, but still needed Windows. I chose to use Microsoft Windows Server 200…
We’ve all felt that sense of false security before—locking down external access to a database or component and feeling like we’ve done all we need to do to secure company data. But that feeling is fleeting. Attacks these days can happen in many w…
Please read the paragraph below before following the instructions in the video — there are important caveats in the paragraph that I did not mention in the video. If your PaperPort 12 or PaperPort 14 is failing to start, or crashing, or hanging, …

610 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question