Solved

Error C2248: cannot access private struct declared in class

Posted on 2006-10-27
4
419 Views
Last Modified: 2008-01-16
Hi expert,

I don't understand why the following code is not able to compile on Windows, I was able to compile it on redhat 3.0.

ClassFreeMem<ClassOne::ClassTwo>*
      ClassOne::ClassTwo::freememory= 0;
ClassFreeMem<ClassOne>* coneClass::freememory= 0;
struct InitFreeMemPtrs
{
   InitFreeMemPtrs(void)       // Default constructor.
   {
      // Allocate the freestore in the correct order.
      ClassOne::ClassTwo::freememory= new ClassFreeMem<ClassOne::ClassTwo>;  -> compile error here C2248
      ClassOne::freememory= new ClassFreeMem<ClassOne>;
   }

   ~InitFreeMemPtrs(void)      // Default destructor.
   {
      // Delete the freestore in the correct order.
      delete ClassOne::freememory;
      delete ClassOne::ClassTwo::freememory;  -> compile error here C2248
   }
};

InitFreeMemPtrs InitFreeMem;


ClassOne
{
public:
 static FlFreeStoreClass<ClassOne>* freememory;
private:
struct ClassTwo
{
static ClassFreeMem<ClassTwo>* freememory;
}
}


If I move the struct ClassTwo in the public area, then I am able to compile.  At this point, I would like to find a better solution than moving the struct ClassTwo to public.  Why this is able to compile on Linux, but not windows?

Looking foward to hear from you.
0
Comment
Question by:4eyesgirl
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
jkr earned 500 total points
ID: 17820359
I am not sure why that compiles on Linux (it shouldn't), but making 'InitFreeMemPtrs' a 'friend' of 'ClassOne' should work, i.e.

ClassOne
{
friend struct InitFreeMemPtrs;
public:
 static FlFreeStoreClass<ClassOne>* freememory;
private:
struct ClassTwo
{
static ClassFreeMem<ClassTwo>* freememory;
}
}


0
 

Author Comment

by:4eyesgirl
ID: 17820520
Jkr -

Do you know the compile did let this line of code compile?  
ClassFreeMem<ClassOne::ClassTwo>*
      ClassOne::ClassTwo::freememory= 0;
What is the difference between this one than the one in the constructor?


0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 17820641
Shouldn't compile either, but may (erroneously) look like a static member initializer to the compiler. Weird.
0
 

Author Comment

by:4eyesgirl
ID: 17820648
Thanks jkr.

As alwasy - you are a great help!!!
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: SunnyDark
This article's goal is to present you with an easy to use XML wrapper for C++ and also present some interesting techniques that you might use with MS C++. The reason I built this class is to ease the pain of using XML files with C++, since there is…
Basic understanding on "OO- Object Orientation" is needed for designing a logical solution to solve a problem. Basic OOAD is a prerequisite for a coder to ensure that they follow the basic design of OO. This would help developers to understand the b…
The viewer will learn additional member functions of the vector class. Specifically, the capacity and swap member functions will be introduced.
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question