Solved

New Linux Network

Posted on 2006-10-30
8
176 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-16
I need to create  Linux servers that will handle DNS, Mail, Intranet, DHCP, File, Print, etc.  These all need to be accessible from Windows XP clients.

My question is:

Should this all be done on one big server or a bunch of smaller ones?

Keep in mind that I need to be able to access files from the XP clients.  I don't want the clients to have to enter username/password everytime they connect to a different server.  I know Samba will be used, should it be installed on every server or just the one that handles logins?  

As you have probably guessed, I need to completely remove my Windows servers and go with a complete Linux backend.  Suggestions and/or How To's would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:gharveyz28
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
8 Comments
 
LVL 95

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
Comment Utility
So is this a misguided attempt at cost reductions?  Figuring that you can cut out the licensing costs by going with Linux since Linux has no licensing costs?  Problem being your staff is not well versed in linux (guessing, am I right?) and so the costs your saving on licensing will be easily outspent on training for linux.

As for whether these should be run on one server or multiple servers, that depends on how reliable the services and server(s) are as well as how powerful...  Though unless "etc" is something like a database server, a moderately configured linux server should do nicely for 25-50 people... so how big is your business?  And why are you getting rid of Windows?

(Hey, Linux is great, but in my opinion, it's not a wise idea to replace your systems with a linux system or systems unless you have SKILLED Linux people on staff).  This recommendation will hopefully change in the years to come... but for now...
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:gharveyz28
Comment Utility
Cost reduction and reliability.

As far as the staff being well versed, they are but I'm not.  Our comapny size is at 30 and will not grow anymore then 50 in the next 5 years.  I have a Dual Xeon Server with 8 GB RAM and a little over 1 TB of space.  The plan is to do this all using VMware.

Windows is no longer an option, while I agree with you the cost savings aren't that much if you take into account the time and energy I am using on this project, but the choice isn't mine.  I'd much rather go with a Windows environment, but that won't be the case here.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
Comment Utility
Why Vmware?
A 50 user Linux box should run those apps just fine as a standalone.
0
 
LVL 95

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
Comment Utility
Actually, a properly implemented Windows network would be far less expensive using Small Business Server - which handles 75 users or less easily and for a VERY reasonable cost.  

But I agree... what's the point to VMWare?

30-50 users should be EASILY handled on the hardware you have (running Linux or Windows).
0
Do You Know the 4 Main Threat Actor Types?

Do you know the main threat actor types? Most attackers fall into one of four categories, each with their own favored tactics, techniques, and procedures.

 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
ygoutham earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
the server spec that you have given is MORE than adequate as a standalone which can support all your requirements, plus add ons like ftp, web etc.  but that would mean all your eggs are in one single basket.  my suggestion would be to have a lesser machine even a desktop loaded with linux and with dual NIC for your mail, dhcp, dns, web requiremnets. and one (current machine) more for samba file sharing and printing.  users can always do with two passwords (which i think everyone has). one for file sharing and one for email. atleast it gives you the liberty to seggregate the intranet and internet as two separate entities.

goutham
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:gharveyz28
Comment Utility
SBS is out of the question.  Completely useless.

VMware is for not having all my eggs in one basket.  I can have the images and can move them around between VM servers.

0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
Comment Utility
So you're running ESX?
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
Comment Utility
If you want hassle free all in one Linux with nice management features,I'd do Novell OES.
Choice of Linux or Netware kernal and Edir so that you can manage all of your users and passwords from a single point of management.
0

Featured Post

Complete VMware vSphere® ESX(i) & Hyper-V Backup

Capture your entire system, including the host, with patented disk imaging integrated with VMware VADP / Microsoft VSS and RCT. RTOs is as low as 15 seconds with Acronis Active Restore™. You can enjoy unlimited P2V/V2V migrations from any source (even from a different hypervisor)

Join & Write a Comment

Network Interface Card (NIC) bonding, also known as link aggregation, NIC teaming and trunking, is an important concept to understand and implement in any environment where high availability is of concern. Using this feature, a server administrator …
Over the last ten+ years I have seen Linux configuration tools come and go. In the early days there was the tried-and-true, all-powerful linuxconf that many thought would remain the one and only Linux configuration tool until the end of times. Well,…
Learn how to navigate the file tree with the shell. Use pwd to print the current working directory: Use ls to list a directory's contents: Use cd to change to a new directory: Use wildcards instead of typing out long directory names: Use ../ to move…
This demo shows you how to set up the containerized NetScaler CPX with NetScaler Management and Analytics System in a non-routable Mesos/Marathon environment for use with Micro-Services applications.

744 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

18 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now