?
Solved

SBS 2003 SP1 on AMD Athlon 64

Posted on 2006-10-31
4
Medium Priority
?
302 Views
Last Modified: 2008-03-17
The quick question is:  Will installing SBS 2003 on a 64-bit platform work with full SBS functionality?

Microsoft is very coy in their requirement documents as to processor types.  I've looked through several of their documents and have yet to find an unambiguous answer.

The genesis of my question is that I seem to recall (correctly?) that Exchange 2003 can only run on 32-bit architecture.  Thus I'm looking for a direct yes/no as to whether I can install and successfully run everything in SBS 2003 on a CPU which is 64-bit.  And it doesn't help that AMD bills their cihpset as "being able to run both 64- and 32-bit apps."  If my premise about Exchange 2003 is correct, then in the former instance (pure 64-bit), it would seem no.  In the latter (AMD's claim that the Athlon 64 handles both), I have no idea.

Thanks.

0
Comment
Question by:RG-MCSE
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 74

Accepted Solution

by:
Jeffrey Kane - TechSoEasy earned 500 total points
ID: 17849263
There's no problem at all running SBS2003 on a 64-bit machine (although it must run in 32-bit mode).  Whever you've heard about Exchange not running on 64-bit isn't true, it was due to some poorly written Microsoft documents (see:  http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2005/11/18/414796.aspx)

If I were buying a new server today for SBS I'd only get 64bit since the next version of SBS will be out in less than 2 years and it will only be released in 64bit.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
0
 

Author Comment

by:RG-MCSE
ID: 17851856
Jeff,

Okay, I see that I have to install the 32-bit version of Windows for this to work.  Great article.

And yes, it's a no brainer now... 64-bit hardware purchase.

Thanks.

RG
0
 
LVL 74

Expert Comment

by:Jeffrey Kane - TechSoEasy
ID: 17854791
Well, there is ONLY a 32bit version of Windows SBS 2003, so that's your only choice at the moment.  Exchange installs with that at the same time.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
0
 

Author Comment

by:RG-MCSE
ID: 17854893
Excellent!

You just saved me time looking for a product that doesn't exist, just so I could say, "No, I want this other one, the 32-bit version, because that's what will run on my brand new 64-bit hardware."

:-D

Be well, Jeff, and thanks again.
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction At 19:33 (UST) on Tuesday 21st September the long awaited email arrived with the subject title of “ANNOUNCING THE AVAILABILITY OF WINDOWS SBS 7 PREVIEW”.  It was time to drop whatever I was doing and dedicate as much bandwidth as possi…
I’m often asked about newer and larger USB drives connected to SBS2008 and 2011 failing Windows Server Backup vs the older USB drives not failing. As disk space continues to grow and drive technology change SBS2008 and some SBS2011 end up with the f…
Is your data getting by on basic protection measures? In today’s climate of debilitating malware and ransomware—like WannaCry—that may not be enough. You need to establish more than basics, like a recovery plan that protects both data and endpoints.…
As many of you are aware about Scanpst.exe utility which is owned by Microsoft itself to repair inaccessible or damaged PST files, but the question is do you really think Scanpst.exe is capable to repair all sorts of PST related corruption issues?
Suggested Courses

862 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question