Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 511
  • Last Modified:

Cisco ACL Processing Time

Hi,

Is their any evidence to suggest that the longer a Cisco ACL is, the greater the time from packet source to destination? Also, is their any evidence to suggest that the location of an ACL entry within the ACL also determines this time? Any links to evidence would be fantastic.

Mike
0
Barnardos_2LS
Asked:
Barnardos_2LS
  • 2
1 Solution
 
pjtemplinCommented:
There's tons of evidence and recommendations that you optimize your ACLs to put the most-hit clauses as close to the top as your policy will allow.  Long ACLs don't necessarily mean more latency or CPU utilization, but long ACLs where packets match very far down in the ACL (i.e. a final permit ip any any after 2000 lines) do mean more latency and CPU utilization.

On high-end routers, Cisco offers "turbo ACLs" which do not increase CPU load or latency based on ACL length.  That alone is evidence that ACL length (with respect to where in the ACL most packets match) matters.
0
 
Barnardos_2LSAuthor Commented:
Have you any links for these recommendations?

Mike
0
 
pjtemplinCommented:
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now