Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 508
  • Last Modified:

Cisco ACL Processing Time

Hi,

Is their any evidence to suggest that the longer a Cisco ACL is, the greater the time from packet source to destination? Also, is their any evidence to suggest that the location of an ACL entry within the ACL also determines this time? Any links to evidence would be fantastic.

Mike
0
Barnardos_2LS
Asked:
Barnardos_2LS
  • 2
1 Solution
 
pjtemplinCommented:
There's tons of evidence and recommendations that you optimize your ACLs to put the most-hit clauses as close to the top as your policy will allow.  Long ACLs don't necessarily mean more latency or CPU utilization, but long ACLs where packets match very far down in the ACL (i.e. a final permit ip any any after 2000 lines) do mean more latency and CPU utilization.

On high-end routers, Cisco offers "turbo ACLs" which do not increase CPU load or latency based on ACL length.  That alone is evidence that ACL length (with respect to where in the ACL most packets match) matters.
0
 
Barnardos_2LSAuthor Commented:
Have you any links for these recommendations?

Mike
0
 
pjtemplinCommented:
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now