Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of mhamer
mhamer

asked on

Fail over Options for exchange 2003

What are they,  we have a cluster and backups, and a previous question i asked pointed out there is no replication of mailboxes available.

I find it hard to belive that that all companies using exchange just put up with down time should a server break.

is there alternatives or do they just  go offline whilst servers restored?

cheers

windows and exchange 2003.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of lollygagr
lollygagr

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Avatar of redseatechnologies
redseatechnologies
Flag of Australia image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of lollygagr
lollygagr

It's a given that you take all reasonable steps to secure and harden Exchange so as to mitigate risk, and clustering is a big step.  The best disaster recovery option is to never have a true disaster.  However, as a customer of mine found out when Katrina hit one of their Exchange sites last year, not all risk can be mitigated.  Dial-tone recovery is definitely a worst-case scenario option, and should only be implemented where justified by the potential risk.  With readily-available virtual server infrastructure, however, it's pretty easy to implement and can dramatically cut downtime even when a whole physical site is down.