We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

We've partnered with Certified Experts, Carl Webster and Richard Faulkner, to bring you two Citrix podcasts. Learn about 2020 trends and get answers to your biggest Citrix questions!Listen Now

x

need to scale a shape without losing information

DangerMode
DangerMode asked
on
Medium Priority
246 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-16
I have a list of points which define a shape
I need to shrink the shape
I know which direction to move the points
because if the angle is concave or convex
but sometimes if the points are too close to each other
they overlap and produce the wrong results

does anyone know of a good scaling algorithm that can avoid or compensate for this problem?
Comment
Watch Question

ozo
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Top Expert 2015

Commented:
multiplying the coordinates of all the points by a constant will scale the shape

Author

Commented:
It must be done on a point by point basis
A uniform scale doesnt preserve the original shape but it does keep it proportional.
Therefore when computing the new point based on a cross vector at certain angles if the scale is to big
the points overlap themselves.

ozo
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Top Expert 2015

Commented:
Multiplying on a point by point basis is what I said.
A uniform scale preserves the original shape and keeps it proportional,
(which I thought were the same thing, unless you are using "shape" or "proportional" in a way I don't understand)
Points have 0 size, so the only way they can overlap is if they are the same point.
How do you interpolate the points? with splines? Maybe you should make an image of the image in normal mode, and then
scale it down (undersample, take for subsampling 2 times, every second pixel).

Commented:
I agree with ozo from what youv said...

Another way to do it would be to calculate or store the centre point of the shape and use this to determine the distance of each point in the shape boundary for which you have a reading from that point.  This way you could scale the shape by directly calculating the new size in proportion to its original position along the vector between it and the centre point.

It really depends on your original design and the complexity of the shapes you are drawing...

I created a shape drawing program, which deals with simple geometric forms such as squares, circles, triangles, diamonds and stars...  I treated each as a circle...

A square is a circle with only 4 points on its circumference recorded, a triangle has 3 points recorded... etc

The method I outlined for resizing worked well in this approach, proportionality was always maintained...  Rotating the shape was also simple...  
To draw the shape you just need the centre point, the radius or the circle and the angle of rotation, the draw method is identical regardless of the shape type, using these parameters, using oom

More complex shapes may require a different approach

Commented:
To draw the shape you just need the centre point, the radius or the circle and the angle of rotation, the draw method is identical regardless of the shape type, using these parameters, using oom

And the number of points on the circumference....   Sorry...

Author

Commented:
I apologize for not being able to articulate what I need, it is hard to say in words so I have created a couple pictures to show you.
Basically, I dont want uniform proportional scaling as that doesnt maintain a uniform distance away from the line. (contraction or erosion scaling) not sure the proper term for this either?
http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o209/DangerMode/bad-vector.gif
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Top Expert 2015
Commented:
given points (x0,y0) (x1,y1) (x2,y2) in clockwise order, and constant distance d
A01 = y1-y0;
B01 = x0-x1;
A12 = y2-y1;
B12 = x1-x2;
C01 = A01*x0+B01*y0+d*sqrt(A01*A01+B01*B01);
C12 = A12*x1+B12*y1+d*sqrt(A12*A12+B12*B12);
Det=A01*B12-A12*B01;
newX1= (B12*C01-B01*C12)/Det;
newY1= (A01*C12-A12*C01)/Det;

Not the solution you were looking for? Getting a personalized solution is easy.

Ask the Experts

Author

Commented:
You are awesome finally someone who understands!
that is what I am doing

1) do you know the name of this algorithm, what would you call this?

So the problem arises when the distance is bigger then the point density and then points overlap
like in this case
http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o209/DangerMode/vectorerr1.gif
(sorry the point numbers are upside down, but they show where the algorithm breaks down)

2) I thought of several approaches to fix it like removing those points and making a point at intersection etc
and all have other problems with them,
If you have any leads or ideas on how to fix this I would really really appreciated it.
ozo
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Top Expert 2015

Commented:
It looks like you want to take the boundary defined by the black line (adding points were lines intersect) and eliminate all points contained inside that boundary. (using a non-zero or poitive winding number definition of inside)
ozo
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Most Valuable Expert 2014
Top Expert 2015

Commented:
Here's how postscript defines different kinds of line joins
http://www.capcode.de/help/setlinejoin
http://www.capcode.de/help/setmiterlimit
Access more of Experts Exchange with a free account
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Create a free account to continue.

Limited access with a free account allows you to:

  • View three pieces of content (articles, solutions, posts, and videos)
  • Ask the experts questions (counted toward content limit)
  • Customize your dashboard and profile

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.