Solved

Counter issue

Posted on 2006-11-13
7
276 Views
Last Modified: 2006-11-30
hi,

this class method writes row into excel file. Is there a way I can allow only to write 10 rows and ignore rest if any.?????

-----------------------------------------
........
public void addRow(Object[] theValues) throws Exception {
       
        try {
            mCurrentRow++;    
            mSheet.insertRow(mCurrentRow);
            for (int i = 0; i < theValues.length; i++) {
                Object v = theValues[i];
                if (v != null) {
                    WritableCell cell = new Label(i, mCurrentRow, v.toString());
                    mSheet.addCell(cell);
                }                
            }
        }
        catch (Exception e) {
           ...
        }        
    }
........
----------------------------------------------


I tried this but didnt worked......still wrote all rows.
while (counter < 10)
{
 try { ...}
}

thx.
PH
0
Comment
Question by:princehyderabad
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
7 Comments
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:suprapto45
ID: 17935118
Might be

            for (int i = 0; i < theValues.length; i++) {
                if (i <= 10) {
                    Object v = theValues[i];
                    if (v != null) {
                        WritableCell cell = new Label(i, mCurrentRow, v.toString());
                        mSheet.addCell(cell);
                    }        
                }      
            }
0
 

Author Comment

by:princehyderabad
ID: 17935130
nope I already tried that as well didnt worked.

Someone wht the knowledge how xls file would be created using java will have good idea to solve this...
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:suprapto45
ID: 17935250
Then can't help you much. Sorry.
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 19

Expert Comment

by:Kuldeepchaturvedi
ID: 17939215
for (int i = 0; i < theValues.length; i++) {
                    Object v = theValues[i];
                    if (v != null) {
                        WritableCell cell = new Label(i, mCurrentRow, v.toString());
                        mSheet.addCell(cell);
                    }        
                if(i==9)
       break;
            }
it will break on the 10th row after writing.

now you need to keep in mind that it will not stop my making extra cells in the excel sheet. ( its still gonna default to 65556 rows in Excel because thats what excel do when it creates a empty sheet)
0
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
jessegivy earned 125 total points
ID: 17941359
       try {
            mCurrentRow++;    
            mSheet.insertRow(mCurrentRow);
            for (int i = 0; i < theValues.length && i<10; i++) {
                Object v = theValues[i];
                if (v != null) {
                    WritableCell cell = new Label(i, mCurrentRow, v.toString());
                    mSheet.addCell(cell);
                }                
            }
        }
        catch (Exception e) {
           ...
        }  

...the second argument of the for loop is a condition, you can specify additional conditions using && or ||

the break statement will work, but I find this solution a bit cleaner and may be ever so slightly beneficial for performance.

~Jesse
0
 

Author Comment

by:princehyderabad
ID: 17941541
I tried this and work. But tell me the most beneficial for performance wise.

 try {
            mCurrentRow++;    
if (mCurrentRow < 10)
            {
            mSheet.insertRow(mCurrentRow);
             for loop { ..}
            }//end if
        }
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:jessegivy
ID: 17963228
if it works, it works, you're talking about iterating ten times so performance isn't an issue, I believe including a second condition would slow slightly as opposed to iteration within because it's using an and statement which in essence is running two conditions simultainiously, and requires less code, how the processor interprets this code is dbatable, I doubt anyone knows?  Ultimatly though, this would only be a consideration if you were doing hundreds or thousands of iterations or calling the function that contains this loop quite a few times.

make sense?  Hope I didn't confuse, just showing a different, more condensed way to accomplish the same thing.

Cheers,

Jesse
0

Featured Post

Secure Your Active Directory - April 20, 2017

Active Directory plays a critical role in your company’s IT infrastructure and keeping it secure in today’s hacker-infested world is a must.
Microsoft published 300+ pages of guidance, but who has the time, money, and resources to implement? Register now to find an easier way.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Did you know that more than 4 billion data records have been recorded as lost or stolen since 2013? It was a staggering number brought to our attention during last week’s ManageEngine webinar, where attendees received a comprehensive look at the ma…
The Windows functions GetTickCount and timeGetTime retrieve the number of milliseconds since the system was started. However, the value is stored in a DWORD, which means that it wraps around to zero every 49.7 days. This article shows how to solve t…
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…

749 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question