SAS vs SCSI

I need help, for building my web server,  are SAS disk comparable to SCSI disks ?
I mean with reliability, availability and performance.

thanks
MaddogsloAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
giltjrConnect With a Mentor Commented:
SAS is what high end SAN's use.  Serial based SCSI (SSA, FC-AL, or SAS) can, and do, obtain much higher transfer rates.  The speed of sending electrons down the wire has increased so much that parallel connection must build in long delays due to skew.  Skew is the reason that fiber connections are all serial.

However, for a web sever I would say that SAS maybe a bit over kill.  My guess is that you are not going to exceed the peformance of parallel SCSI.

Database servers, or anything else, that must do tons of I/O against lots of data are targets for SAS.
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
SAS = Serial Attached SCSI - they should be as reliable and perform as well or better than SCSI.
0
 
ReidlymonCommented:
Your question got me curious too.  I did some poking around at Seagate's website and found this...

http://www.seagate.com/products/interface/sas/faq.html

I also went to Adaptec's site and found a nice 11 page pdf.  ^_^  Pretty interesting stuff.

http://www.adaptec.com/pdfs/SASEndUserGuide.pdf

Hope this sheds some light.  Did for me.
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.