Solved

Can virtual function be defined and still requests derived classed to implement it

Posted on 2006-11-19
3
210 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
Hi Experts,

In the following example, I want functionOne( ) to be implemented by all of the derived classes of A including 'grand child' C.  So, If I leave the keyword 'virtual' in B's functionOne( ) then that means C does not have to implement it.  So, I want to keep the virtual keyword with B's functionOne( ).  Is it okay?  If we don't have class C, then we have A's functionOne( ), B's functionOne( ) both with the virtual keyword.  Will it cause any problem?

So, when I want derived classes to implement a function, no matter where they are in the class hierarchy then should I always keep the virtual keyword with the function.  

Thank you.

class A
{
   virtual void functionOne();
};

class B: public A
{

    virtual void functionOne() { cout << "B's functionOne" << endl;};
};

class C: public B
{
    void functionOne( );
};

void main()
{
    B bb;
   bb.functionOne( );
};
0
Comment
Question by:ambuli
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
Axter earned 500 total points
ID: 17975791
Hi ambuli,
>     virtual void functionOne() { cout << "B's functionOne" << endl;};
The virtual keyword does not do anything here, and it's optional.  Many programmers add the keyword to the derive function, just to add extra clarification.
But it serves no function as far as the compiler is concern.  The code would be compile the same with it or without it.

David Maisonave (Axter)
Cheers!
0
 

Author Comment

by:ambuli
ID: 17975942
Thanks Axter, Yes that is the results I got after doing some experiment.  By the way, the virtual seems to play some role in the constructor below.  If I don't have the virtual keyword in the destructor for AA, then when deleting b, only BB's destructor is called.  But, having the virtual keyword calls both destructor.

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;



class AA{
public:
      ~AA( ){ cout << "A's destructor" << endl;};
};
class BB: public AA
{
public:
      ~BB( ){ cout << "B's destructor" << endl;};
};


void main()

{

      AA *b = new BB();
      delete b;


}


0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Axter
ID: 17975999
virtual plays a role in the base class, and you should have at least one virtual method in the base class if you're going to delete a derived object using the base class pointer.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This article is a continuation of the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger series. Part 1 provided a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focused on additional topics in breakpoints. As your assignments become a little more …
This article shows you how to optimize memory allocations in C++ using placement new. Applicable especially to usecases dealing with creation of large number of objects. A brief on problem: Lets take example problem for simplicity: - I have a G…
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will learn how to clear a vector as well as how to detect empty vectors in C++.

803 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question