Solved

active/active vs active/passive cluster question

Posted on 2006-11-20
5
521 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-15

In my current situation, I have a active/passive situation, but I'm being pressured to turn it into a active/active under the perception that it will improve crunching power.

As I understood, Microsoft Clustering; it is a high-availability solution, not a load balancing one.

So with a active/active cluster, what are the benefits in a SQL environment?    It's not as if 2-nodes can share a single virtual SQL instance, so what would be the point of building a active/active cluster?

Thanks!

0
Comment
Question by:Marketing_Insists
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:DireOrbAnt
ID: 17984802
First keep in mind that you only need one SQL license for an active/passive setup, two for an active/active one.
a/a is not load balancing in a round robin or NLB way... You have to balance the load yourself by creating two or more SQL instances.
The most basic setup will be two instances, one owned by each node. If you only have one database, or several interconnected ones, going to two instances might slow down joins over linked server.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Marketing_Insists
ID: 17984919
So I could increase crunching power by going active-active?

Is this safe to do? (a sql instance per node and a single database)
0
 
LVL 143

Accepted Solution

by:
Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3] earned 250 total points
ID: 17985209
active/active means that you have basically 2 databases. one on each node under normal conditions, but both on the same node in case of 1 node going down.
you will indeed, for normal conditions, have 2 times the power, but you have to be aware (and test), that in case 1 node goes down (or has to go down for maintenance), that the 2 database share only 1 node's power.

>Is this safe to do? (a sql instance per node and a single database)
correct statement is: you have 2 sql instances on each node. one active and one passive in normal conditions.
correctly, the naming of the 2-node-cluster would hence be active+passive/passive+active . active/active is shorter :)

you can use the 2 databases to share load. however, the clustering will not help you natively, you have to do that via the application code, for example a web server farm in case of a web application.
0
 
LVL 26

Assisted Solution

by:DireOrbAnt
DireOrbAnt earned 250 total points
ID: 17988995
>>active/active means that you have basically 2 databases.
I just want to make apotential correction. It means you have 2 INSTANCES. They might each have one DB, thus 2 DBs :)
0
 

Author Comment

by:Marketing_Insists
ID: 17989006
So would you say that active/active is more of a hardware conservation measure?
0

Featured Post

Complete VMware vSphere® ESX(i) & Hyper-V Backup

Capture your entire system, including the host, with patented disk imaging integrated with VMware VADP / Microsoft VSS and RCT. RTOs is as low as 15 seconds with Acronis Active Restore™. You can enjoy unlimited P2V/V2V migrations from any source (even from a different hypervisor)

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article explains how to reset the password of the sa account on a Microsoft SQL Server.  The steps in this article work in SQL 2005, 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2014 and 2016.
In this article we will learn how to backup a VMware farm using Nakivo Backup & Replication. In this tutorial we will install the software on a Windows 2012 R2 Server.
Via a live example, show how to shrink a transaction log file down to a reasonable size.
This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop…

860 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question