?
Solved

Full Network Access Between Two Cisco 877 Routers in EasyVPN Server/Client Link Up

Posted on 2006-11-20
3
Medium Priority
?
374 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-16
I am able to establish a VPN link between HQ and a remote site using two Cisco 877 routers configured as a EasyVPN server and client configuration.

Upon establishing the remote site with a "network extension" mode (not "client" mode), I am only able to ping the HQ Cisco 877 internal IP address but not any other valid internal IPs at HQ. HQ too can only ping the remote site's Cisco 877 internal IP address. "Interesting" traffic has been set correctly as ping destination are forced via the VPN tunnel when pings are made to both ends' internal IP addresses. But a traceroute (in MSDOS prompt) reveals a "Request timeout error" to IPs other than the Cisco 877 routers' interal IP addresses.

Testing the VPN tunnel (on the remote site's Cisco 877) reveals this error despite a successful link up:

"A ping with data size of this VPN interface MTU size and 'Do not Fragment' bit set to the other end VPN device is failing. This may happen if there is a lesser MTU network which drops the 'Do not fragment' packets."

Both sites have static public IP address for the routers.

What could be the problem?
0
Comment
Question by:portalphenom
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
WGhen earned 2000 total points
ID: 17989674
The VPN encryption makes the packet size larger.  If it exceeds the MTU size of the router, and it refuses to fragment the packet then the packet must be dropped.   Standard mtu is 1500.
Try reducing the MTU size a little.  In your WAN interface on both ends:
     int s0/0         [or whatever]
     ip mtu 1400
 

1400 probably slightly smaller than it needs to be, but if this works then you can try, say 1450, 1480 etc. until you break it again.

WGhen
0

Featured Post

Bringing Advanced Authentication to the SMB Market

WatchGuard announces the acquisition of advanced authentication provider, Datablink, with one mission – to bring secure authentication to SMB, mid-market, and distributed enterprises with a cloud-based solution, ideal for resale via their established channel & MSSP community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The Cyber News Rundown brings you the latest happenings in cyber news weekly. Who am I? I’m Connor Madsen, a Webroot Threat Research Analyst, and a guy with a passion for all things security. Any more questions? Just ask.
With the rising number of cyber attacks in recent years, keeping your personal data safe has become more important than ever. The tips outlined in this article will help you keep your identitfy safe.
This video Micro Tutorial shows how to password-protect PDF files with free software. Many software products can do this, such as Adobe Acrobat (but not Adobe Reader), Nuance PaperPort, and Nuance Power PDF, but they are not free products. This vide…
Sometimes it takes a new vantage point, apart from our everyday security practices, to truly see our Active Directory (AD) vulnerabilities. We get used to implementing the same techniques and checking the same areas for a breach. This pattern can re…
Suggested Courses

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question