Solved

Should objects in share mem regions be volatile?

Posted on 2006-11-26
3
255 Views
Last Modified: 2010-04-01
Should an object placed in an IPC shared-mem region be declared volatile, to alert the compiler that the object's internal values could change at any time?  Or would that be useless unless the internal values themselves are declared volatile?

I have an object stored in a shared memory region.  I use placement new to build the object there.  Should I declare it volatile?
0
Comment
Question by:chsalvia
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
jkr earned 125 total points
ID: 18014761
I would not place any objects in a shared memory area at all in the 1st place., but that's a different thing. Yes, it would be a good idea to declare them as volatile to tell the compiler not to use them in optimizations. It would be even better to synchronize access to these objects, though.
0
 

Author Comment

by:chsalvia
ID: 18014905
>>I would not place any objects in a shared memory area at all in the 1st place

Why?  I realize there is a danger if the object contains a pointer to another memory area, but if the object is completely self-contained, what's the harm?

>> It would be even better to synchronize access to these objects, though.

But how would multiple processes be able to share the object, without shared mem?  I suppose each process could have a unique object, which uses a file to construct itself.  But that would be much slower than just using shared mem.

0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 18014945
Syncing access is something different, you have to take care that the data is not altered at the same time by different processes.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
C++ Properties One feature missing from standard C++ that you will find in many other Object Oriented Programming languages is something called a Property (http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/CPP/A_3912-Object-Properties-in-C.ht…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.

920 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

16 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now